Another dietary myth bites the dust: So-called ‘good cholesterol’ not so helpful

As JunkScience.com has pointed out for years (until we got hijacked by climate idiocy), dietary research is filled with lies.

The media release is below.

Study challenges “good” cholesterol’s role in universally predicting heart disease risk
Lower levels of HDL cholesterol were associated with increased risks for heart attacks in white but not Black adults, and higher levels were not protective for either group

Peer-Reviewed Publication
NIH/NATIONAL HEART, LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE

This article is under embargo. It is not available for public release until 21-Nov-2022 14:00 ET (21-Nov-2022 19:00 GMT/UTC)
A National Institutes of Health-supported study found that high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, often called the “good cholesterol,” may not be as effective as scientists once believed in uniformly predicting cardiovascular disease risk among adults of different racial and ethnic backgrounds.

The research, which published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, found that while low levels of HDL cholesterol predicted an increased risk of heart attacks or related deaths for white adults – a long-accepted association – the same was not true for Black adults. Additionally, higher HDL cholesterol levels were not associated with reduced cardiovascular disease risk for either group.

“The goal was to understand this long-established link that labels HDL as the beneficial cholesterol, and if that’s true for all ethnicities,” said Nathalie Pamir, Ph.D., a senior author of the study and an associate professor of medicine within the Knight Cardiovascular Institute at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. “It’s been well accepted that low HDL cholesterol levels are detrimental, regardless of race. Our research tested those assumptions.”

To do that, Pamir and her colleagues reviewed data from 23,901 United States adults who participated in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study (REGARDS). Previous studies that shaped perceptions about “good” cholesterol levels and heart health were conducted in the 1970s through research with a majority of white adult study participants. For the current study, researchers were able to look at how cholesterol levels from Black and white middle-aged adults without heart disease who lived throughout the country overlapped with future cardiovascular events.

Study participants enrolled in REGARDS between 2003-2007 and researchers analyzed information collected throughout a 10- to 11-year period. Black and white study participants shared similar characteristics, such as age, cholesterol levels, and underlying risk factors for heart disease, including having diabetes, high blood pressure, or smoking. During this time, 664 Black adults and 951 white adults experienced a heart attack or heart attack-related death. Adults with increased levels of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides had modestly increased risks for cardiovascular disease, which aligned with findings from previous research.

However, the study was the first to find that lower HDL cholesterol levels only predicted increased cardiovascular disease risk for white adults. It also expands on findings from other studies showing that high HDL cholesterol levels are not always associated with reduced cardiovascular events. The REGARDS analysis was the largest U.S. study to show that this was true for both Black and white adults, suggesting that higher than optimal amounts of “good” cholesterol may not provide cardiovascular benefits for either group.

“What I hope this type of research establishes is the need to revisit the risk-predicting algorithm for cardiovascular disease,” Pamir said. “It could mean that in the future we don’t get a pat on the back by our doctors for having higher HDL cholesterol levels.”

Pamir explained that as researchers study HDL cholesterol’s role in supporting heart health, they are exploring different theories. One is quality over quantity. That is, instead of having more HDL, the quality of HDL’s function – in picking up and transporting excess cholesterol from the body – may be more important for supporting cardiovascular health.

They are also taking a microscopic look at properties of HDL cholesterol, including analyzing hundreds of proteins associated with transporting cholesterol and how varying associations, based on one protein or groups of proteins, may improve cardiovascular health predictions.

“HDL cholesterol has long been an enigmatic risk factor for cardiovascular disease,” explained Sean Coady, a deputy branch chief of epidemiology within the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)’s Division of Cardiovascular Sciences. “The findings suggest that a deeper dive into the epidemiology of lipid metabolism is warranted, especially in terms of how race may modify or mediate these relationships.”

The authors conclude that in addition to supporting ongoing and future research with diverse populations to explore these connections, the findings suggest that cardiovascular disease risk calculators using HDL cholesterol could lead to inaccurate predictions for Black adults.

“When it comes to risk factors for heart disease, they cannot be limited to one race or ethnicity,” said Pamir. “They need to apply to everyone.”

The REGARDS study is co-funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute of Aging and received additional support from NHLBI.

To learn more about cholesterol and heart health, visit https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/blood-cholesterol.

To learn about heart-healthy living, visit https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/heart-healthy-living.

Study: Zakai NA, Minnier J, Safford MM, et al. Race-dependent association of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with incident coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.027.

###

2 thoughts on “Another dietary myth bites the dust: So-called ‘good cholesterol’ not so helpful”

  1. “Black and white study participants shared similar characteristics, such as age, cholesterol levels, and underlying risk factors for heart disease, including having diabetes, high blood pressure, or smoking.”

    It would be handy to have a full list of the “similar characteristics” and “underlying risk factors”. As stpaulchuck pointed out, the difference between the incidence of heart attacks could be down to some hitherto unsuspected difference between blacks and whites.

    As an aside, the report talks only of “participants” – it does not state whether there were any differences in results for men and women, which makes me think that either a participant’s sex was not captured (unlikely) or results were not analysed by sex (improbable) or there was no significant differences found (possible).

    I can sense stpaulchuck’s frustration: “why didn’t they look for some other difference ?”, but I suspect the essential problem is that the study was simply not capturing sufficient “characteristics” and “underlying risk factors” to include the real factor(s) influencing who gets a heart attack and who doesn’t.

    “The goal was to understand this long-established link that labels HDL as the beneficial cholesterol, and if that’s true for all ethnicities,”
    “It’s been well accepted that low HDL cholesterol levels are detrimental, regardless of race. Our research tested those assumptions.”

    Talking about HDL cholesterol in those terms risks a spurious association of cause and effect.

    My suspicion/conclusion is that the HDL level is merely an EFFECT of some unidentified factor. Changing one’s diet in an attempt to influence one’s level of HDL may be a complete waste of time. Worse, it may fool you into thinking that by artificially manipulating your HDL level you are also changing the likelihood of future heart disease.

    The “real” determinant of who gets a heart attack may be something as simple as use of Viagra (or cocaine, or something): rich whites can afford it and poor blacks can’t; but if researchers don’t suspect it as a cause, they are not going to capture usage statistics.

    However, regardless of any shortcomings in what the study did (or did not) reveal, it has a produced a result that HDL level predicts nothing for you if you’re a black and maybe nothing useful if you’re white.

  2. did no one suggest looking at an imbalance of some OTHER factor between blacks and whites than HDL? Blacks may have a chemical factor that works with HDL or in lieu of HDL that whites do not.

    Seems stupid not have looked for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from JunkScience.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading