About the new PM2.5-kills study debunked here yesterday, former UCLA epidemiologist and JunkScience.com ally Jim Enstrom tells me: “BMJ asked me to review the manuscript for this paper in January. I gave BMJ a SUPER-NEGATIVE nine-page review. BMJ is supposed to show the peer-review history of all research papers, but the Peer Review link for this paper states: “Sorry, there is no peer review to display for this article.”
