JAMA summarily rejects Enstrom manuscript spotlighting errors in 2002 Pope PM2.5 study

JAMA editor-in-chief Howard Bauchner doesn’t want anyone to burst his PM2.5 science fraud bubble.

Below is Dr. Jim Enstrom’s February 21 letter to Bauchner:

Here Bauchner’s summary response on February 23:

Pope’s 2002 study is here.

JunkScience is not able to publish Enstrom’s manuscript as he intends it for a journal, but a summary of his points may be found here.