Study: No warming at Antarctic Peninsula

“Our study highlights the complexity and difficulty of attributing effect to cause.”

The media release is below.

###

A recent pause in Antarctic Peninsula warming
The stabilization of the ozone hole and changing wind patterns has driven a regional cooling phase

BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY

The rapid warming of the Antarctic Peninsula, which occurred from the early-1950s to the late 1990s, has paused. Stabilisation of the ozone hole along with natural climate variability were significant in bringing about the change. Together these influences have now caused the peninsula to enter a temporary cooling phase. Temperatures remain higher than measured during the middle of the 20th Century and glacial retreat is still taking place. However, scientists predict that if greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise at the current rate, temperatures will increase across the Antarctic Peninsula by several degrees Centigrade by the end of this century.

Reporting this week in the journal Nature researchers from British Antarctic Survey (BAS) describe how the stabilisation of the ozone hole and changing wind patterns has driven a regional cooling phase that is temporarily masking the warming influence of greenhouse gases.

Lead author, Professor John Turner of British Antarctic Survey says: “The Antarctic Peninsula is one of the most challenging places on Earth on which to identify the causes of decade-to-decade temperature changes. The Antarctic Peninsula climate system shows large natural variations, which can overwhelm the signals of human-induced global warming. In recent years, there has been an international research effort to explain what’s happening in the region and to understand the implications for the Antarctic environment and future sea-level rise.

“Our study highlights the complexity and difficulty of attributing effect to cause. The ozone hole, sea-ice and westerly winds have been significant in influencing regional climate change in recent years. Even in a generally warming world, over the next couple of decades, temperatures in this region may go up or down, but our models predict that in the longer term greenhouse gases will lead to an increase in temperatures by the end of the 21st Century.”

A wide range of climate data was analysed for this study, including atmospheric circulation fields, sea-ice records, ocean surface temperatures and meteorological observations from six Antarctic Peninsula research stations with near-continuous records extending back to the 1950s.

During the Twentieth Century, Antarctic Peninsula temperatures increased by up to 0.5? C per decade, helping to trigger the dramatic collapse of ice shelves and causing many glaciers to retreat. Whilst there was a decrease in sea ice extent around the Antarctic Peninsula towards the end of the last century it has been increasing in recent years, particularly in the north-east of the region. The cold easterly winds observed in the 21st Century have had a greater impact on the region because the sea ice has prevented ocean heat from entering the atmosphere.

To set their observations in a longer-term context, the research team looked at a 2,000 year climate reconstruction using the chemical signals in ice cores. As previously reported, analysis suggests that peninsula warming over the whole twentieth century was unusual, but not unprecedented in the context of the past 2,000 years. The reconstruction shows a warming starting in the 1920s, which is consistent with the warming trends recorded by the meteorological stations. The ice core records also reveal periods of warming and cooling over the last several centuries that were comparable to those observed in the post-1950s instrumental record. This highlights the large natural variability of temperatures in this region of Antarctica that has influenced more recent climate changes.

Dr Robert Mulvaney, is a leading ice core researcher at British Antarctic Survey. He says:

“Meteorological observations from the Antarctic Peninsula research stations only cover the last 60 years or so. If we are to get a better idea of the long-term trend we need to look back in time. The ice core record helps us see how the climate evolves over the longer term. We can also look at the levels of carbon dioxide and other chemicals that were in the atmosphere and compare them with observations from today.”

In the last month, the levels of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere above Antarctica rose past the 400 parts per million milestone, contrasting with the pre-industrial level of 280 parts per million recorded in Antarctic ice cores. Climate model simulations predict that if greenhouse gas concentrations continue to increase at currently projected rates their warming effect will dominate over natural variability (and the cooling effect associated with recovering ozone levels) and there will be a warming of several degrees across the region by the end of this century.

###

The paper: Absence of 21st century warming on Antarctic Peninsula consistent with natural variability by John Turner, Hua Lu, Ian White, John C. King, Tony Phillips, J. Scott Hosking, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Gareth J. Marshall, Robert Mulvaney and Pranab Deb is published this week in Nature

This research was funded by NERC (Natural Environment Research Council).

7 thoughts on “Study: No warming at Antarctic Peninsula”

  1. The peninsula is not even a part of Antarctica. Geologically it is the southern end of the Andes mountains and the terminus of the Pacific Ring of Fire.

  2. “….Together these influences have now caused the peninsula to enter a temporary cooling phase….” – a laughable statement among others riddled throughout this ‘paper’. It’s almost as if they presented this conundrum to a primary school cohort and a bunch of 3rd graders came up with some fantastical theories.

  3. Funny thing about the old ’cause and effect’ relationship. If the cause is known, the effects are inevitable and obvious. But we can only see effects, and working backwards to identify the causes is sometimes almost impossible. As my chemistry teacher told me, “A molecule has no memory. Knowing it’s current state gives no indication how it got into that state.”

  4. There may be some value in the report, BUT, without some way of separating the measurements for geothermal activity, which is quite high on the peninsula, it is really meaningless. There are open areas due to geothermal activity. The number of low level active volcanoes and hot spots is quite high in general with a thinner crust allowing a higher warming over the whole western Antarctic.

  5. “The reconstruction shows a warming starting in the 1920s, which is consistent with the warming trends recorded by the meteorological stations. The ice core records also reveal periods of warming and cooling over the last several centuries that were comparable to those observed in the post-1950s instrumental record.”
    I look forward to hearing the BBC report that….What! No?

  6. I love it: any decrease in atmospheric temperate is always categorized as merely a “pause” [in warming], while an increase is always described with the certainty that it is a harbinger of rampant global warming that if not immediately constrained will soon reach catastrophic levels. And it is carefully pointed out that any “cooling” is the temporary effect of natural climate variability, but on the other hand, warming always is driven by human CO2 producing activity.

  7. I notice references to the ozone ‘hole’ and also its ‘closing’. This makes me highly sceptical of the value of the rest of the information contained in the article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from JunkScience.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading