Maybe the NYTimes should have thought of this before it helped wreck the coal industry?
From the NYTimes editorial page:
The Obama war on coal could leave taxpayers with $45 billion in liabilities.
Maybe the NYTimes should have thought of this before it helped wreck the coal industry?
From the NYTimes editorial page:
The Obama war on coal could leave taxpayers with $45 billion in liabilities.
“The NY Times certainly had no problem lobbying for billion upon billions of taxpayers dollars being stolen to bail out incompetent banks and General Motors.”
I guess this website was of course not made by anyone with special interests (ie. Cato Institute). Also, straight from Wikipedia:
It was founded as the Charles Koch Foundation in 1974 by Ed Crane, Murray Rothbard, and Charles Koch,[6] chairman of the board and chief executive officer of the conglomerate Koch Industries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cato_Institute
Gee, ‘making taxpayers pay for the mess caused by others’?
The NY Times certainly had no problem lobbying for billion upon billions of taxpayers dollars being stolen to bail out incompetent banks and General Motors.
And again when Obama doubled the amount of taxpayers money that Bush had given to the shysters.
“A cottager and his wife had a Hen that laid a golden egg every day. They supposed that the Hen must contain a great lump of gold in its inside, and in order to get the gold they killed [her]. Having done so, they found to their surprise that the Hen differed in no respect from their other hens. The foolish pair, thus hoping to become rich all at once, deprived themselves of the gain of which they were assured day by day.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Goose_That_Laid_the_Golden_Eggs
The story leaves out the task of cleaning up the crime scene.
The NY Times does it’s utmost to make coal unprofitable and put them out business, and then complain that they didn’t clean up afterwards. All the the while the NY Times was using the electrical power provided by coal. Is it possible to be any more stupid?