Not much. But this is distraction. The key issue is subsidence.
The media release is below.
How much does groundwater contribute to sea level rise?
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
Groundwater extraction and other land water contribute about three times less to sea level rise than previous estimates, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change. The study does not change the overall picture of future sea level rise, but provides a much more accurate understanding of the interactions between water on land, in the atmosphere, and the oceans, which could help to improve future models of sea level rise.
“Projecting accurate sea level rise is important, because rising sea level is a threat to people who live near the ocean and in small islands,” explains IIASA researcher Yoshihide Wada, who led the study. “Some low-lying areas will have more frequent flooding, and very low-lying land could be submerged completely. This could also damage substantially coastal infrastructure.”
Sea level has risen 1.7 mm per year over the 20th and the early 21st century, a trend that is expected to continue as climate change further warms the planet. Researchers have attributed the rising seas to a combination of factors including melting ice caps and glaciers, thermal expansion (water expands as it gets warmer), and the extraction of groundwater for human use.
Land water contributions are small in comparison to the contribution of ice melt and thermal expansion, yet they have been increasing, leading to concerns that this could exacerbate the problem of sea level rise caused by climate change.
However, much uncertainty remains about how much different sources contribute to sea level rise. In fact, sea level has actually risen more than researchers could account for from the known sources, leading to a gap between observed and modeled global sea-level budget.
Previous studies, including estimates used in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, had assumed that nearly 100% of extracted groundwater ended up in the ocean. The new study improves on previous estimates by accounting for feedbacks between the land, ocean, and atmosphere. It finds that number is closer to 80%. That means that the gap between modeled and observed sea level rise is even wider, suggesting that other processes are contributing more water than previously estimated.
“During the 20th century and early 21st century, cumulative groundwater contribution to global sea level was overestimated by at least 10 mm,” says Wada. In fact, the new study shows that from 1971 to 2010, the contribution of land water to global sea level rise was actually slightly negative – meaning that more water was stored in groundwater and also due to reservoir impoundment behind dams. From 1993 to 2010, the study estimates terrestrial water as contributing positive 0.12 mm per year to sea level rise.
The study does not change the fact that future groundwater contribution to sea level will increase as groundwater extraction increases. And the increasing trend in groundwater depletion has impacts beyond sea level rise. Wada explains, “The water stored in the ground can be compared to money in the bank. If you withdraw money at a faster rate than you deposit it, you will eventually start having account-supply problems. If we use groundwater unsustainably, in the future there might not be enough groundwater to use for food production. Groundwater depletion can also cause severe environmental problems like reduction of water in streams and lakes, deterioration of water quality, increased pumping costs, and land subsidence.”
###
I have argued this very point for quite some time now in defense of land use changes being the biggest contribution to the observation of locations with the greatest sea level rise like Miami Beach, intercoastal Maryland, and the Mississippi River delta of southern Louisiana. Extracting groundwater at high rates collapses the supporting ground surrounding those water droplets, which acts like a partially deflating balloon. Sea levels will then naturally be able to reach higher on that balloon than historically possible, leading to the false belief that the sea level itself is increasing while the reference point of the land is actually decreasing. In the Mississippi Delta, the Army Corps of Engineers built a network of canals to expedite water away quickly from the surrounding swampy areas. This had the unfortunate effect of preventing normal flood waters, laden with sediment, from overflowing the banks and recharging the surrounding lands with not only water but new land. Over time, this has allowed relentless surf action to whittle away the coastline bit by bit. The truth is painfully obvious to anyone with a modicum of common sense and historical sleuthing, but we’re on such a hell-or-high-water trajectory that the ACoE absolutely refuses to acknowledge their complicity in the development of wasting shorelines or that restoration of normal flooding events is vital to restoring the delta.
The one consistency is that the more man meddles, the worse the outcome is going to be.
Mark: You have a very valid point! Something well worth considering.
Here is an opportunity to turn their own weapons upon them. They have taken California’s water away from Agriculture and even household use to “save the delta smelt!!!” Just claim it is this water that should have been used for growing crops with contributing to “sea level rise”.
How much does erosion and the washing away of dirt globally affect the rising sea level? The Amazon alone adds tons of sediment yearly to the Atlantic basin. I never see this mentioned.