Argues subpoena represents unwarranted fishing expedition into its records that violates its constitutional rights.
From the WSJ:
Argues subpoena represents unwarranted fishing expedition into its records that violates its constitutional rights.
From the WSJ:
It’s about time.
The entire matter is based upon loud mouth intimidation.
Ignore it and expose them for the shysters they are.
It’s a house of cards.
We can only hope they continue to fight the system and the government head hunters.
When having a dissenting opinion becomes a crime, we will all be wearing armbands.