13 thoughts on “Scientists Finally Admit Climate Models Are Failing To Predict Global Warming”

  1. No surprises here. Remember, these are the same kinds of people that were predicting the next ice age back in the late 1960s. People will say anything for research grant funding. However, they may be correct, we will know in about 800 years.

  2. Why do scientists deceive the public? To try to hide the source of energy that powers the Sun and sustains every atom, life and planet in the solar system a FACT indelibly recorded in exact rest masses of the 3,000 types of atoms that compromise all matter.

  3. WHY?

    Because Einstein reported mass (m) is stored energy (E) in 1905:

    E = mc^2

    Aston measured exact rest masses of the atoms and reported in the last paragraph of his Nobel Lecture in 1922:

    1. The PROMISE of “powers beyond the dreams of scientific fiction”, and

    2. The WARNING nuclear energy might become uncontrollable and change Earth to a star

    After atomic bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Aug 1945, independent nations and national academies of sciences were united on Oct 1945 to

    1. Avoid Aston’s WARNING of nuclear annihilation, and to

    2. Sacrifice Aston’s PROMISE of essentially unlimited energy.

    NAS directed public funds to scientists to claim ~97% “consensus scientific evidence” for false standard models of Earth’s climate, the cosmos, the nucleus and the Sun.

  4. Oliver WTF!!! Does your SPAM got to do with this post ? Please STFU !!!! You make us all llook like loons with your SPAM !!

  5. “Reality has deviated from our expectations.”

    A clear statement of the fact that these “scientists” have firmly grasped the wrong end of the stick.
    A ~real~ scientist would have stated it as ” Our expectations have deviated from reality.”
    But that would require them to admit that they have been wrong, their modeling is wrong, and therefore all the sturm and drang is wrong.
    It’s the old story of garbage in = garbage out.
    Reality has an inconvenient tendency to do what it wants, not what some observer with a faulty theory wants.

  6. when the models misrepresent some climate forces, parameterize others simply because they are not understood, omit others completely and cannot calculate to the required degree of precision what fool would expect a climate “model” to be accurate.

    as for the information supposedly withheld for seventy years; nuclear fission is not nuclear fusion.

  7. Yes Oliver, end your SPAM nonsense. I am trained in physics and examined your electric universe/iron neutron sun argument and it has no validity. It violates known basic physics and is simply false. It is in the category of astrology. Your arguments are not a valid scientific discussion.

  8. Oliver, Alcoa has promised you a lifetime supply of hats.
    At my request, they will also include some fine foil shards that will greatly improve the operation of any electronic device you use to connect to the internet.

Comments are closed.