3 thoughts on “No Global Warming For 58 Years: What The Government Is Hiding”
most of the faked data is based on estimations.
WMO 2013-
“Because the data with respect to in-situ surface air temperature across Africa is sparse, a one year regional assessment for Africa could not be based on any of the three standard global surface air temperature data sets from NOAANCDC, NASA-GISS or HadCRUT4 Instead, the combination of the Global Historical Climatology
Network and the Climate Anomaly Monitoring System (CAMS GHCN) by NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory was used to estimate surface air temperature patterns”
so there we have it- one fifth of the world’s land mass is just estimated, haven even added in the rest that’s estimated.
There is so much evidence of this kind of fraud, that, to me, it has become a “good” example of quod erat demonstrandum (that-which is to be- demonstrated or proven). I’m glad there’re people, such as here, who have sense and know the difference between true science and “real science” (yuck).
I foresee ‘adjustments’ to the 58-year radiosonde temperature record very shortly. I’m someone who recognizes patterns of behavior. In this case, the behavior of warmists which can best be summed up as – “If the data doesn’t fit the hypothesis then adjust it until it does.”
Leave a Reply
Discover more from JunkScience.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
most of the faked data is based on estimations.
WMO 2013-
“Because the data with respect to in-situ surface air temperature across Africa is sparse, a one year regional assessment for Africa could not be based on any of the three standard global surface air temperature data sets from NOAANCDC, NASA-GISS or HadCRUT4 Instead, the combination of the Global Historical Climatology
Network and the Climate Anomaly Monitoring System (CAMS GHCN) by NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory was used to estimate surface air temperature patterns”
so there we have it- one fifth of the world’s land mass is just estimated, haven even added in the rest that’s estimated.
There is so much evidence of this kind of fraud, that, to me, it has become a “good” example of quod erat demonstrandum (that-which is to be- demonstrated or proven). I’m glad there’re people, such as here, who have sense and know the difference between true science and “real science” (yuck).
I foresee ‘adjustments’ to the 58-year radiosonde temperature record very shortly. I’m someone who recognizes patterns of behavior. In this case, the behavior of warmists which can best be summed up as – “If the data doesn’t fit the hypothesis then adjust it until it does.”