Why did the EPA spend $1.4 million on guns?
The EPA doesn’t need or have Second Amendment rights.
Read “Environmental Protection Army?” in the Washington Times.
Why did the EPA spend $1.4 million on guns?
The EPA doesn’t need or have Second Amendment rights.
Read “Environmental Protection Army?” in the Washington Times.
Best were they to invest in ballistic protection garments for their senior officers as well as their field agents.
They’re gonna need ’em, because (as one Japanese naval officer had put it): “In America, there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.”