What?
Report here.
Summary below (click to enlarge):
Example of unreliable weak association epidemiology serving as basis for this nonsense.
What?
Report here.
Summary below (click to enlarge):
Example of unreliable weak association epidemiology serving as basis for this nonsense.
doctors and coroners have all been paid off by Big Noise
a recent study has prove a 100% linkage with death rates and the presence of dihydrogen-oxide
the presence of oxygen has been linked to a 100% death rate
Show me a death certificate that says “death by noise”.
I doubt noise pollution will kill me, but I would like to see the environMENTALists spend as much time, energy, and money fighting booming stereos, barking dogs, and loud exhausts as they do everything that doesn’t really bother me.
Add that to the claimed 500,000 EU deaths from ‘air pollution.’
Yep. Purposeful consequences of dumbing down the curriculum mid-1960s. Very few people know what science actually is anymore.
Not sure how to put the genie back in the bottle.
So if you drank milk as a child you will die. Linking is not causation.
I believe any report that includes a statement to the effect that such-and-such has been “linked with” any particular medical problem in humans should be treated as pure rumor-mongering.
If it can be proven, then prove it; if it cannot be proven, then the authors should shut up and do some REAL research – independently replicable, controlled, IAW with standard protocols (i.e. Koch’s postulates), peer reviewed, etc.