Who knows, since he is such a sensitive man.
One thing I know for sure–the hockey stick was a hoax. Or can I say such a thing, given his propensity for sensitivity?
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/376574/print
Who knows, since he is such a sensitive man.
One thing I know for sure–the hockey stick was a hoax. Or can I say such a thing, given his propensity for sensitivity?
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/376574/print
That is a very good article. Extremely even-handed on the questions of climate change (bending over backwards to give alarmists the benefit of the doubt) and yet clearly showing how Mann’s behaviour is both hypocritical and fully deserving of the terms used by Steyn. I still find it hard to believe that the suit has continued for this long – it should have been dismissed – with prejudice – a long time ago.
A class action suit against Mann et al sounds good right now.
Isn’t hoax a synonym for fraud?