I certainly have no objection. Thanks ACSH.
I am a member of the ACSH Policy and Advisory panel, when I disagree with them it’s a point of order not a sign of departure.
No problems here, for sure.
http://acsh.org/2014/04/strong-case-junk-science-dr-enstrom-vs-ucla/
I’d like to add to our recent encomium to Dr. Enstrom and his just struggle with his UCLA oppressors, that the underlying basis for the treacherous assault on him by the university was his fervent evidence-based exposure of the lack of credibility of the science behind the air pollution regs. posited by the CARB. But let us not forget that the Cal. body was undoubtedly inspired by the Federal EPA’s dirty doings on the same (and numerous similar) topics: see e.g. this article: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/epa-concedes-we-can-t-produce-all-data-justifying-clean-air-rules in which EPA Admin. McCarthy admits the agency wears no clothes.