<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cholesterol absorption inhibitor added benefit?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2014/03/cholesterol-absorption-inhibitor-added-benefit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/03/cholesterol-absorption-inhibitor-added-benefit/</link>
	<description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: STeve		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/03/cholesterol-absorption-inhibitor-added-benefit/#comment-8317976315264140226</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[STeve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=51740#comment-8317976315264140226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://junkscience.com/2014/03/cholesterol-absorption-inhibitor-added-benefit/#comment-8317976315264140225&quot;&gt;bwanajohn&lt;/a&gt;.

Did anyone every answer this question?  I, also, would like to know the answer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://junkscience.com/2014/03/cholesterol-absorption-inhibitor-added-benefit/#comment-8317976315264140225">bwanajohn</a>.</p>
<p>Did anyone every answer this question?  I, also, would like to know the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bwanajohn		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/03/cholesterol-absorption-inhibitor-added-benefit/#comment-8317976315264140225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bwanajohn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=51740#comment-8317976315264140225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Lower levels of LDL, regardless of how you achieve them, are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events.&quot;
Can someone, anyone, show me a study that actually has this conclusion?  Every study on statins I have seen have shown considerable reductions in LDL levels but no or very, very tenuous association with reduced CVD events.  Anyone? Anyone? Buehler?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lower levels of LDL, regardless of how you achieve them, are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events.&#8221;<br />
Can someone, anyone, show me a study that actually has this conclusion?  Every study on statins I have seen have shown considerable reductions in LDL levels but no or very, very tenuous association with reduced CVD events.  Anyone? Anyone? Buehler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>