Bill Gates a Victim or Perp on Common Core?

Bill Gates learned two big things in the last twenty years that went beyond his obvious knowledge in his business:

1. Discard bad products (Vista comes to mind and some other less than booming successes) and;
2. Don’t mess with big Government (the antitrust case).
The essay linked below discusses what Gates didn’t learn about what he doesn’t know–educational policy–that caused him to fall victim to the fatal conceit that Friedrich Hayek condemned as lethal in public policy making.
Government can spend more than any company–they spend the taxpayer’s money–so to ignore the power and reach of government (the anti trust suit with a corrupt judge in charge) is to risk too much. Also big government is decidedly anti capitalist/free market, so crony capitalism and statism is the safe harbor for big business.
So now Gates is a political actor, with Warren Buffet, a lefty Plutarch philosopher king as a mentor. He thinks he can make Africa healthy without DDT and with green approaches to basic infrastructure.
He thinks he can fix an illiterate, poorly educated citizenry, that includes an illiterate political class headed by a quasi literate president.
Good luck Bill.
I think when bad things happen, to assume good intentions of intelligent actors is silly.
Just because he made a lot of money and created good computer products, doesn’t mean that Bill Gates is wise in the ways of the world, like politics or pedagogical theories.
He takes advice from whom? Warren Buffet, who is a limousine lib and I am sure a boat load of sycophant academics with bulging portfolios. He is the richest man in the world, after all.
He commits to improving education and contributes large sums to the project Common Core, and then recruits socialist Deweyites, who have created the dysfunctional education system he wants to fix? The definition of foolishness or Einstein’s definition of insanity is to repeat yourself hoping for a better outcome.
When bad things happen, it’s easy to say–good intentions but mistaken proposed solutions, or, in his shortened experience in education and his upbringing, Bill Gates became incurably ignorant because he became a true believer in socialism, convinced of the better nature of socialist oligarchy as a societal model.
Better yet Gates and others like him have been convinced that with more money and better computers/management, a socialist egalitarian utopia, that allowed for a few Plutarchs/oligarchs like themselves and their elite friends, was just around the corner and the masses could be bedded down as well fed, well-trained, dependent and tame.
Bill and Melinda Gates share a mindset and attitude with all of academia, elites, and the chattering class on politics, so why wouldn’t they share that mindset on pedagogy, epistemology, and educational methods and goals? Can you imagine the lack of real discussion or debate in their salons and libraries on any number of topics and the sacred totem positions held by the left?
It’s called the fatal conceit–if you were the richest man in the world, would conceit stalk your every waking moment, and would not your wife support your high opinion of yourself and your wisdom in business, political and philanthropic activities? How long do courtesans last if they point out the mistakes, foibles, or ignorance and failures of the regent?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/03/common_core_anatomy_of_a_failure.html

4 thoughts on “Bill Gates a Victim or Perp on Common Core?”

  1. Wow, I am so convinced…with a YouTube video!
    Chemtrails don’t exist; climate can’t be changed and neither can weather. Enough with your ridiculous conspiracies.
    Not surprising coming from an anti-vaccine, anti-science Greenie such as yourself.

  2. Bill didn’t create good computer products. He created good consumers for his products. Everything he sold was mediocre at best and lousy most of the time. He knew how to manipulate the pointy-haired bosses into forcing Microsoft products upon their underlings — employees, students, &c. He also knew how to sell to independent computer users (my father was a total fan of Microsoft, so I know how that worked) but his invasion of corporate and government computing markets through bribery masquerading as charity was one of the things that earned him that anti-trust suit. Whether or not the judge was corrupt I don’t know, but the defendant certainly was.
    Don’t overestimate Bill’s contribution to technology. Don’t underestimate his knowledge of human behaviour. He can screw up education and other noble causes like nobody else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from JunkScience.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading