<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Blood Pressure Guidelines Released&#8211;Not much	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/</link>
	<description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: luisadownunder		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139644</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[luisadownunder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My BP is consistently 116/75. Am over 60 so I&quot;m a little worried...not :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My BP is consistently 116/75. Am over 60 so I&#8221;m a little worried&#8230;not 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Scarborough		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139643</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Scarborough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the nurse is hard of hearing my systolic is much closer to my diastolic.  The most consistent readings are from machines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the nurse is hard of hearing my systolic is much closer to my diastolic.  The most consistent readings are from machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: john1282		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139642</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john1282]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 02:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[absoluuuuutly not.  115 is good, but top normal is 140.
150 if u be old.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absoluuuuutly not.  115 is good, but top normal is 140.<br />
150 if u be old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ralphcramdo		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139641</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ralphcramdo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought the &quot;new&quot; systolic normal was supposed to be 115?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the &#8220;new&#8221; systolic normal was supposed to be 115?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>