<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel> <title> Comments on: New Blood Pressure Guidelines Released–Not much </title> <atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/</link> <description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod> hourly </sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency> 1 </sy:updateFrequency> <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator> <item> <title> By: luisadownunder </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139644</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[luisadownunder]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:04:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139644</guid> <description><![CDATA[My BP is consistently 116/75. Am over 60 so I"m a little worried...not :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My BP is consistently 116/75. Am over 60 so I”m a little worried…not 🙂</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: Scott Scarborough </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139643</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Scarborough]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:12:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139643</guid> <description><![CDATA[If the nurse is hard of hearing my systolic is much closer to my diastolic. The most consistent readings are from machines.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the nurse is hard of hearing my systolic is much closer to my diastolic. The most consistent readings are from machines.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: john1282 </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139642</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[john1282]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 02:18:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139642</guid> <description><![CDATA[absoluuuuutly not. 115 is good, but top normal is 140. 150 if u be old.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absoluuuuutly not. 115 is good, but top normal is 140.<br /> 150 if u be old.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: ralphcramdo </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2014/02/new-blood-pressure-guidelines-released-not-much/#comment-8317976315264139641</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[ralphcramdo]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://junkscience.com/?p=49531#comment-8317976315264139641</guid> <description><![CDATA[I thought the "new" systolic normal was supposed to be 115?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the “new” systolic normal was supposed to be 115?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>