So let’s see if I get this right. Mitch Daniels can’t talk about conservative ideas and offer political opinions as a former governor because lefty faculty members who talk politics in the classrooms want to censor him.
And lefties like Ritter can say what they want and go back and forth to academic positions, like the pathetic Napolitano. Am I supposed to think that Napolitano is at UC because of her academic oeuvre?
Give me another censorship break.
I would like to put a good shout in for Mitch Daniels right up to the point where he apologized for talking to a conservative organization. Why should he apologize, cause some lefty politico academic at Purdue got upset?
Why do conservatives always come up with a reason to apologize. Mitch did good as a governor, and Howard Zinn is a commie America hater.
http://www.city-journal.org/2014/24_1_snd-university-politics.html
good get. I will fix
Quite obvious: conservative speech is “hate speech,” Can’t allow that on campus. Just ask any “progressive.”
/sarc
Napolitano is at UC, not Sebelius.
The reason this Hoosier recognized a long time ago that Mitch was an excellent governor but could never be president. He is just is not willing to take the left head on at their own game and he lacks Reagan’s wit to do it in a more obtuse manner.
Mitch Daniels is a mensch.