The tyranny of the administrative state is poised to impose.
Regulations will be raining down on industry and individuals in this new despotism that is the EPA.
The new regime is the regime of tyranny of the mandarins.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/11/27/epa-preparing-to-unleash-a-deluge-of-new-regulations/?print=1
one more bigger doc–that includes the admisions by EPA researchers that they are doing small particle human exposure experiments because their small particles premature death epidemiology isn’t proof of anything.
that’s in the devlin declaration under penalty of perjury.
This is in spite of their testimony before congress that small particles kill hundreds of thousands of people every year.
John Dale Dunn MD JD Consultant Emergency Services/Peer Review Civilian Faculty, Emergency Medicine Residency Carl R. Darnall Army Med Center Fort Hood, Texas Medical Officer, Sheriff Bobby Grubbs Brown County, Texas 325 784 6697 (h) 642 5073 (c)
actually your points are consistent with what I have seen.
however, never, in my experience, have I seen an adequate challenge of the bad tox and epidmiology–wanna know why–because lawyers are too damn lazy to get up to speed and they are intimidated by the idea of challenging the army of white coats.
you are an erudite man.
read these essays to see what I am talking about.
then look back on all your experience and see if you can remember one lawyer who was conversant with the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, and the scientific guidance on epidemiology and toxicology that is violated by the EPA research all the time.
Also how many lawyers did you see who were conversant with how to use the Rules of Evidence and the Daubert jurisprudence to create, in a hearing or a trial, evidentiary challenges that would carry the day and eliminate junk science by the EPA or create an evidentiary ruling issue on appeal.
they always want to argue about process, constitutional issues, property rights, economic burdens, but they will always lose because even they think that the EPA claims about saving lives is valid and is based on reliable evidence–it’s not, they don’t have a thing but pounding the table and claiming they are saviors.
Anyway, you are a serious guy, might take an hour to read these short essays. your experience and knowledge is invaluable to this battle and who knows, you might see some interesting and helpful things that we have missed.
I attach above the letters to congressmen and the deans of the domestic medical schools.
here are the essays.
Holding EPA to account Joe Barton speech http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/03/holding_the_epa_to_account.html
EPA can be stopped http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/03/holding_the_epa_to_account.html
a strategy to stop the epa science abuse http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/a_strategy_to_stop_epa_science_abuse.html
the EPAs unreliable science http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/03/the_epas_unreliable_science.html
epa unethical research http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/epas_unethical_air_pollution_experiments.htm
Milloy and Dunn at JPANDS on EPA Human Experiments
http://www.jpands.org/vol17no4/dunn.pdf
California enviro policy issues
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/californias_toxic_air_scare_ma.html
toxic air scare http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/science_and_the_toxic_scare_ma_1.html
John Dale Dunn MD JD Consultant Emergency Services/Peer Review Civilian Faculty, Emergency Medicine Residency Carl R. Darnall Army Med Center Fort Hood, Texas Medical Officer, Sheriff Bobby Grubbs Brown County, Texas 325 784 6697 (h) 642 5073 (c)
Thanks,
Business/industry people do their best to limit the cost of compliance but will go along with the rule because they believe it is less costly and creates less negative publicity. In addition, the larger the business/industry, the easier it is to absorb the cost compared to competitors. Civil penalties and fines are not usually litigated because it is generally less expensive to negotiate the fine down and sign the consent order with the “I didn’t do it and promise not to do it again” clause. Going to court and litigating this stuff is more expensive and more bad publicity. The regulators know this and are more than willing to have the big press conference, get the bean in their jar, then negotiate the reduced fine. I was involved in a complaint by EPA years ago that somehow ended up before an Administrative Law Judge. We won. The costs were substantially higher than the $250k fine and it only took 4 years to settle the case.
Greens Kill Birds and Bats and Other Living Things. They kill by Building Bird and Bat Killing Wind Turbines and Skyrocketing Energy prices that causes fuel poverty that impoverish and Kill Poor people. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/15/james-hansens-policies-are-shafting-the-poor/ Greens kill by Converting tropical rain forests and land that grows food crops into land that grows biofuel crops. Eugenists with a Green shirt.
Earth to Greens, President Obama and the EPA: Tying climate change to man made CO2 is just not viable in light of the discrepancy between the Climate models and reality. – See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2013/1…
Bottom line there is no credible reason to commit energy suicide when there is no empirical evidence that CO2 mitigation will have any tangible impact on Climate Change. The only people who will benefit are Obama’s crony green capitalists http://greencorruption.blogspot.com/
who cannot exist without government subsidies. Everyone else will suffer as fuel prices “skyrocket” The poor will suffer the most. Obama and the Democrats claims that they are the champions of poor is just another one of the Lefts many lies.
Why the lies you ask? Answer: So the elite in power can scam hard working people out of more of their money to stop Climate Change which is a complete farce. http://greencorruption.blogspo… No matter what government does ,including going back to the stone age, CO2 mitigation efforts will have NO TANGIBLE impact on the climate PERIOD! http://youtu.be/0gDErDwXqhc It appears the world is being run by a bunch of power and money hungry criminals. Who else would perpetuate this type of lunatic scam on innocent people?
milloy tells me you are one of the brightest contributors.
thanks for that.
one thing that I find terribly disappointing is how people coming into business are just willing to accept the EPA word.
And I am always disappointed to think that physicians won’t participate in the battle to stop these nannies and their junk science.
John Dale Dunn MD JD Consultant Emergency Services/Peer Review Civilian Faculty, Emergency Medicine Residency Carl R. Darnall Army Med Center Fort Hood, Texas Medical Officer, Sheriff Bobby Grubbs Brown County, Texas 325 784 6697 (h) 642 5073 (c)
There is not anything particularly new about the deluge of environmental regulations. 20 years ago we were talking about more regulations covering less and less. Each round of regulations uses the same logic and backup (save some number of theoretical lives, save untold billions in health care costs). I remember Browner doing her darndest to ban chlorine for sterilizing wastewater. The cure was worse than the disease. It was such a joke that we were covering up Cl on periodic tables. This is just the latest assault. The bad part of this is that once implemented, it is very unlikely that the regs can ever be rescinded. The Democrats want more and more and the Republicans will do nothing more than complain. The R’s are constitutionally incapable of withstanding any publicity that might suggest that they are anti-environment.
I started environmental management (writing applications doing compliance programs, never-ending reports) as an additional duty 30 years ago, it evolved into something I do full time. Every time I can’t believe the regulatory system can get any more idiotic, they prove me wrong. I decided a few weeks ago that it was time to let the kiddies have fun with this idiocy.