3 thoughts on “NOAA blames Spring 2012 hot weather on manmade global warming; UK Met Office says ‘no evidence’ for blaming humans”
The NOAA report refers to and seems to cite a report by the American Meteorological Society. On scanning the NOAA report the conclusions seemed to be: difficult to assess the human impact, no impact and 4x the probability of human influence. Or something like that. I need another couple cups of coffee to understand that. Seems to be written for the headline and add the AMS cover with the Jersey Shore and you have a really exciting piece.
Wow, if you took the word “but” out of the article there would have been less than one page to read. That reads like a bad attempt at a disaster movie scenario than a scientific report. Standards have slipped a bit in the scientific community I guess.
It’s hard to reconcile all of their stories. They change every day.
Leave a Reply
Discover more from JunkScience.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
The NOAA report refers to and seems to cite a report by the American Meteorological Society. On scanning the NOAA report the conclusions seemed to be: difficult to assess the human impact, no impact and 4x the probability of human influence. Or something like that. I need another couple cups of coffee to understand that. Seems to be written for the headline and add the AMS cover with the Jersey Shore and you have a really exciting piece.
Wow, if you took the word “but” out of the article there would have been less than one page to read. That reads like a bad attempt at a disaster movie scenario than a scientific report. Standards have slipped a bit in the scientific community I guess.
It’s hard to reconcile all of their stories. They change every day.