<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Harvard economist on climate sensitivity to CO2: &#8216;It is critical to recognize that every link of this chain is full of deep uncertainty that makes it very difficult to answer the question: by how much?&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2013/06/harvard-economist-on-climate-sensitivity-to-co2-it-is-critical-to-recognize-that-every-link-of-this-chain-is-full-of-deep-uncertainty-that-makes-it-very-difficult-to-answer-the-question-by-how-muc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://junkscience.com/2013/06/harvard-economist-on-climate-sensitivity-to-co2-it-is-critical-to-recognize-that-every-link-of-this-chain-is-full-of-deep-uncertainty-that-makes-it-very-difficult-to-answer-the-question-by-how-muc/</link>
	<description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MT Geoff		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2013/06/harvard-economist-on-climate-sensitivity-to-co2-it-is-critical-to-recognize-that-every-link-of-this-chain-is-full-of-deep-uncertainty-that-makes-it-very-difficult-to-answer-the-question-by-how-muc/#comment-24809</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MT Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=40879#comment-24809</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://junkscience.com/2013/06/harvard-economist-on-climate-sensitivity-to-co2-it-is-critical-to-recognize-that-every-link-of-this-chain-is-full-of-deep-uncertainty-that-makes-it-very-difficult-to-answer-the-question-by-how-muc/#comment-24808&quot;&gt;mossrock&lt;/a&gt;.

Howdy mossrock
I read it kinda the other way: Weitzmann appears to be highlighting the idea that we don&#039;t know what&#039;s going on and that we know less at each stage in the progression from &quot;earth is warming&quot; to &quot;shut down the energy economy.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://junkscience.com/2013/06/harvard-economist-on-climate-sensitivity-to-co2-it-is-critical-to-recognize-that-every-link-of-this-chain-is-full-of-deep-uncertainty-that-makes-it-very-difficult-to-answer-the-question-by-how-muc/#comment-24808">mossrock</a>.</p>
<p>Howdy mossrock<br />
I read it kinda the other way: Weitzmann appears to be highlighting the idea that we don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going on and that we know less at each stage in the progression from &#8220;earth is warming&#8221; to &#8220;shut down the energy economy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mossrock		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2013/06/harvard-economist-on-climate-sensitivity-to-co2-it-is-critical-to-recognize-that-every-link-of-this-chain-is-full-of-deep-uncertainty-that-makes-it-very-difficult-to-answer-the-question-by-how-muc/#comment-24808</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mossrock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=40879#comment-24808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Weitzman does seem to have been among the chorus flogging CO2 as the disaster awaiting us. Nowhere is water vapor addressed, even though it&#039;s concentration is much greater. But if recent years&#039; cold winters, especially in Europe, were an indication. how soon will Weitzman address &quot;Global Cooliong&quot;?
If it&#039;s from PBS, the government subsidized fount of &quot;Global Warming&quot; advocacy, perhaps we should consider the source.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weitzman does seem to have been among the chorus flogging CO2 as the disaster awaiting us. Nowhere is water vapor addressed, even though it&#8217;s concentration is much greater. But if recent years&#8217; cold winters, especially in Europe, were an indication. how soon will Weitzman address &#8220;Global Cooliong&#8221;?<br />
If it&#8217;s from PBS, the government subsidized fount of &#8220;Global Warming&#8221; advocacy, perhaps we should consider the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MT Geoff		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2013/06/harvard-economist-on-climate-sensitivity-to-co2-it-is-critical-to-recognize-that-every-link-of-this-chain-is-full-of-deep-uncertainty-that-makes-it-very-difficult-to-answer-the-question-by-how-muc/#comment-24807</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MT Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=40879#comment-24807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I skimmed the link rather than read it thoroughly. With that caveat, how did someone who appears to be so sensible get past Harvard&#039;s rigorous staff screening process? He makes the skeptic case ever so well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I skimmed the link rather than read it thoroughly. With that caveat, how did someone who appears to be so sensible get past Harvard&#8217;s rigorous staff screening process? He makes the skeptic case ever so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>