So we can agree on something.
From an AOL Energy report featuring Environmental Defense Fund chief scientist Steven Hamburg:
Projections using that 100-year timeframe may be scientifically sound, but they fail to provide an effective framework for policy solutions, according to Hamburg. “It’s totally policy irrelevant,” he said. “If we use 100-year global warming potential, we get what is often the wrong policy answer for the near term.”
They ain’t scientifically sound, neither.