“This slowdown may indicate that the more extreme estimates for climate sensitivity are less likely to prove true. It is not yet an argument for changing the central estimates.”
“This slowdown may indicate that the more extreme estimates for climate sensitivity are less likely to prove true. It is not yet an argument for changing the central estimates.”
We are entering the ‘silly season’ phase of the warmist fraud. All of their masks are being stripped away. Now we’re left with laughable claims like those here, but also like “the ocean ate the warming”. In 5 to 10 years NO ONE will admit they believed in CAGW, just like no one ever believed in eugenics. The ‘consensus’ on dietary salt, high fat diets causing heart disease, population growing out of control, endangered species, the value of biodiversity, and countless other ‘common wisdoms’ will fall over the coming century and their advocates will move on to other goofiness. It’s always been that way.
Gee, I’d have said that once all the models had failed completely, that would be a reason for changing policy, but maybe that’s why I don’t write for Reuters.