Greenpeace: “Why do governments spend $105bn a year on nuclear weapons, rather than on mitigating the risks of the true WMD – ‘weather of mass destruction’?”
“Climate change and a carbon-intensive economy are already responsible for 5 million deaths each year.”
One thought on “Greenpeace: “Why do governments spend $105bn a year on nuclear weapons, rather than on mitigating the risks of the true WMD – ‘weather of mass destruction’?””
I’ll venture a guess: Because nuclear weapons are real and are now?
They’re imbedding a lie in their argument by implying that governments don’t spend money on global warming. Many governments spend, waste, or forego more than that amount in pursuing green fantasies, including California. Many governments, and many government agencies within each government. The $300 million dollar corporation with only demagogic activism as a product is also a liar.
Leave a Reply
Discover more from JunkScience.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
I’ll venture a guess: Because nuclear weapons are real and are now?
They’re imbedding a lie in their argument by implying that governments don’t spend money on global warming. Many governments spend, waste, or forego more than that amount in pursuing green fantasies, including California. Many governments, and many government agencies within each government. The $300 million dollar corporation with only demagogic activism as a product is also a liar.