2 thoughts on “Claim: Cancer rate 15% higher than normal for 9/11 responders — JS: Nonsense”
A classic case of “If you look for something you will find it.” This cancer report is probably junk science because the 9/11 responders (honorable and heroic men and women) are probably being examined more closely for cancers than the general population. This is so glaringly obvious that I hesitate to submit this post. On the other hand, the NY Daily News probably printed this story with no hesitation whatsoever. I just noticed that Steve posted this item 6 weeks ago. Oh well, I’ll submit this just the same.
This claim is politically incorrect. 911 was caused by islamic terrorists and you cannot defame them by blaming them for increased cancer rates.
Leave a Reply
Discover more from JunkScience.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
A classic case of “If you look for something you will find it.” This cancer report is probably junk science because the 9/11 responders (honorable and heroic men and women) are probably being examined more closely for cancers than the general population. This is so glaringly obvious that I hesitate to submit this post. On the other hand, the NY Daily News probably printed this story with no hesitation whatsoever. I just noticed that Steve posted this item 6 weeks ago. Oh well, I’ll submit this just the same.
This claim is politically incorrect. 911 was caused by islamic terrorists and you cannot defame them by blaming them for increased cancer rates.