“”It doesn’t make sense to argue about how much global warming is caused by man—whether it’s 5% or 50%. The best approach is to have a no regrets policy.”
“”It doesn’t make sense to argue about how much global warming is caused by man—whether it’s 5% or 50%. The best approach is to have a no regrets policy.”
How to dance on both sides of an issue. She should consider Dancing With The Stars.
“It doesn’t make sense to argue about how much global warming is caused by man—whether it’s 5% or 50%. The best approach is to have a no regrets policy.” To combat climate change, she argues that the nation needs to pursue all forms of energy but to move more towards cleaner and cleaner fuels as time progresses. “We owe it to ourselves to keep healthy this marvelous world we’ve been given.”
Doesn’t sound like a “no regrets policy” to me.
I’m good with a no regrets policy. But that doesn’t work when Dems, deer-in-the-headlights Republicans, and the Senator suggesting the “best approach is to have a no regrets policy” insist on taking action against Global Warming Windmills [irony intended].