Anti-salt nannies push study that actually debunks alleged benefits of salt reduction

They’re counting on you not reading the study.

From FoodNavigator-USA:

Additionally, there is some evidence that population-wide salt reduction may be associated with lower incidence of heart disease and stroke.

In Finland, where a salt reduction campaign began in the 1970s, average consumption of salt fell by about a third over 30 years, to about 7 g a day for women and 8.3 g a day for men. According to a 2006 study published in Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, during the same time period,
average blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) fell by more than 10–mm Hg, and there was a 75% to 80% decrease in both stroke and coronary heart disease mortality in Finland.

Dr Appel [head anti-salt nanny at Johns Hopkins] commented: “I can’t attribute all of the benefit to sodium reduction, but again it is hard to
believe that there would be a net benefit from the intervention if indeed sodium reduction were harmful.”

But according to Mort Satin of the Salt Institute in Health Outcomes Lessons from Finland’s Salt Reduction:

Despite an almost 50% reduction in the consumption of salt in Finland, there are no health benefits attributable to this intervention.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from JunkScience.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading