Harvard HIV Expert: Baby Not Likely ‘Cured’ of HIV

More drive-by science promoted by sensationalistic media.

From Mark Siedner’s op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal:

… In the case of the Mississippi baby, we know she was exposed to HIV, had HIV in her blood, and that at least some cells in her blood were found with sleeping virus—though we will likely never know if those cells were from the child or maternal cells that had been transmitted during pregnancy or birth. Was the baby infected with HIV and, thus, cured?

To many of the researchers at the conference, the answer is “no.” It seems more likely that her treatment prevented her, after exposure to HIV, from being infected. The reason we give medicines to both pregnant women and their newborns is precisely to prevent HIV exposures in children from becoming established infections, an intervention that can decrease the rate of transmission from about 30% to less than 1% in optimal conditions…

Read more at the WSJ ($ubscription required).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.