Open Richard III DNA evidence for peer review

Too bad the New Scientist doesn’t fee this way about climate science.

“It is gratifying to see a scientific analysis given such worldwide attention. Nonetheless, scientific validity is decided not in courts, but in published work that other scientists can examine, check and criticise.”

Read more at the New Scientist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from JunkScience.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading