<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Top 2013 energy questions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2013/01/top-2013-energy-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://junkscience.com/2013/01/top-2013-energy-questions/</link>
	<description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 20:18:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2013/01/top-2013-energy-questions/#comment-15236</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=33216#comment-15236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Instead of creating Natural Gas Vehicles.   A good plan would be to turn Natural gas into ethanol, and allow it to be used in fuel.  Most cars in the US can run on 85% ethanol as they are flex fuel vehicles.

I think that would be cheaper and easier than building a whole bunch of cars to run off of NG directly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of creating Natural Gas Vehicles.   A good plan would be to turn Natural gas into ethanol, and allow it to be used in fuel.  Most cars in the US can run on 85% ethanol as they are flex fuel vehicles.</p>
<p>I think that would be cheaper and easier than building a whole bunch of cars to run off of NG directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>