“You’d think that the IPCC would have learned its lesson, that it would have told its authors not to rely on these sorts of publications.”
“Critics are blasting a draft U.N. climate change report that combines studies by advocacy groups like the World Wildlife Fund and Greenpeace alongside scientific research papers — the same issue that led independent auditors to slam the U.N.’s last report.” [FOXnews.com]
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t the IPCC announce last year it had ‘fixed’ this problem by *approving* ‘gray literature’? Now that it’s considered good authority, it supposedly can’t be criticized.
What do you expect from these fraudsters.