2 thoughts on “Finally, one of Gore’s trained presenters debates a climate skeptic”
The point of this debate from a skeptics’ perspective might have been to show that the AGW/ACC argument is factually incorrect, logically flawed, and generally inane. That perspective is flawed: NONE OF THAT MATTERS to the opposing side.
In all actuality, the Al Gore camp counts this as a stunning victory: to them this was just a chance to re-re-re-repeat their message, and to gain a bit more legitimacy in the process.
Mission Accomplished.
He was a little too easy to thrash, I wouldn’t be very proud of that.
The Al Gore training camp must have given these people a false sense of security (or superiority), I would really think that anybody with a medical degree could have foreseen that. Ego must have been in his way, not unlike the founder of this religious sect
Leave a Reply
Discover more from JunkScience.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
The point of this debate from a skeptics’ perspective might have been to show that the AGW/ACC argument is factually incorrect, logically flawed, and generally inane. That perspective is flawed: NONE OF THAT MATTERS to the opposing side.
In all actuality, the Al Gore camp counts this as a stunning victory: to them this was just a chance to re-re-re-repeat their message, and to gain a bit more legitimacy in the process.
Mission Accomplished.
He was a little too easy to thrash, I wouldn’t be very proud of that.
The Al Gore training camp must have given these people a false sense of security (or superiority), I would really think that anybody with a medical degree could have foreseen that. Ego must have been in his way, not unlike the founder of this religious sect