NYTimes: Scientists Find New Dangers in Tiny but Pervasive Particles in Air Pollution

No scientist has found anything of the sort…. charlatans maybe, but no scientist.

The New York Times asserts:

Fine atmospheric particles — smaller than one-thirtieth of the diameter of a human hair — were identified more than 20 years ago as the most lethal of the widely dispersed air pollutants in the United States. Linked to both heart and lung disease, they kill an estimated 50,000 Americans each year. But more recently, scientists have been puzzled to learn that a subset of these particles, called secondary organic aerosols, has a greater total mass, and is thus more dangerous, than previously understood.

A batch of new scientific findings is helping sort out the discrepancy, including, most recently, a study led by scientists at the University of California, Irvine, and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash., that is scheduled to be released on Tuesday. It indicates that the compounds’ persistence in the atmosphere was under-represented in older scientific models.

“If the authors’ analysis is correct, the public is now facing a false sense of security in knowing whether the air they breathe is indeed safe,” said Bill Becker, of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies…

Read the entire Times’ report.

Read Steve Milloy’s Washington Times commentary “EPA’s statistics not science, but nonsense.”

2 thoughts on “NYTimes: Scientists Find New Dangers in Tiny but Pervasive Particles in Air Pollution”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.