Under the Kyoto Protocol, it would have cost $50 trillion to get the same “savings” in global temperature.
The Washington Post reports:
With global efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions stalled, the United States and five other countries are starting a new program to cut other pollutants — including methane, soot and hydrofluorocarbons — that contribute to global warming.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is set to announce the five-year initiative Thursday morning. Canada, Sweden, Mexico, Ghana and Bangladesh are also participating. The plan will be administered by the United Nations Environment Program, with a $12 million contribution from the United States for the first two years. Canada will add $3 million; contributions from the other countries are not known.
Carbon dioxide — from burning fossil fuels — plays the largest role in pushing up global temperatures, climate scientists say. But methane, soot and hydrofluorocarbons also contribute to global warming. Combined, those three pollutants are believed to account for 30 to 40 percent of the nearly one degree Celsius rise in global temperatures since the beginning of the 20th century.
If adopted globally, measures to reduce soot and methane emissions could slow global warming by about a half a degree Celsius by 2030, according to research published in January.
They can have a quick effect on global warming because these gases do not last in the atmosphere as long as carbon dioxide does.
“The science is quite clear that the only way to slow warming in the near term . . . is to reduce emissions of these so-called short-lived climate forcers,” said Erika Rosenthal of the advocacy group Earthjustice.
The new program, called the Climate and Clean Air Coalition to Reduce Short-Lived Climate Pollutants, will not set targets for reductions in pollutants. Rather, it will fund education projects and joint public-private efforts to reduce emissions, said three people briefed on the announcement. They said the new program is likely to encourage nations to reduce diesel exhaust, stem the burning of agricultural waste, and capture methane from landfills, coal mines and natural gas wells, among other policies…
The Communists used to call these programs, “5-year plans”. Because they KNOW we KNOW they’re filthy commies, a “plan” becomes the softer, “Initiative”. All of these solutions involve using LESS energy, and as it is NOT NECESSARY to use less energy, because temps have NOT been going up(–check-out all the European News photos, showing everything frozen there {–over 600 deaths, including Russia, due to the Cold}–pictures WE don’t get to see, as our Media doesn’t want us to view Reality over there, while they’re selling “warming”{Fantasy}here), using less energy will be BAD for the economy. To charge ourselves 12 million less, might have “COST” us BILLIONS in pared/dis-couraged production, or consumption of goods from the 3rd world that might NEED our consumption. You notice, she brushes right past the FRAUD of the warmers–the over-stating, the e-mails asking how to reconcile the “data” with the “Means”(–to the end of breaking-down the USA as an economic power/consumer), because to a Commie, ALL that is seen is the dreary, end goal of workers (us) & Party-leaders (them).
Want to get a piece of that $12 million? All you have to do is take part in ‘education projects and joint public-private efforts to reduce emissions’. Pretty soon you’re looking for a raise (more public money) and then you want more staff, so that you can be a supervisor, and get a bump in pay, and pretty soon, you’re touting climate ‘scientists’, and then, you’re part of ‘the consensus’ and your soul is not your own.