<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel> <title> Comments on: Teaching against climate change deniers </title> <atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2012/01/teaching-against-climate-change-deniers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>https://junkscience.com/2012/01/teaching-against-climate-change-deniers/</link> <description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod> hourly </sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency> 1 </sy:updateFrequency> <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator> <item> <title> By: William Nuesslein </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2012/01/teaching-against-climate-change-deniers/#comment-7786</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[William Nuesslein]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:23:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=10075#comment-7786</guid> <description><![CDATA[The theory of evolution was possible once people started to understand geological time. Billions of years would allow adaption to chance events to sculpt the beautiful interrelations of species in the world. Critics said the word of God as expressed in the bible should be taken literally. Evolution is not religion in any sense of the word. Climate change skepticism isn't the same. The argument is that conclusions from climate change research are not robust. The Hockey Stick was a spurious result from pounding too hard on the data. I though that one could put gases into a container and measure the change in spectrum between incoming light and transmitted light. Such data could be fed into super computers and implications drawn. I was willing to let others do the actual calculations as my PC is not quite a super computer. I was disappointed when I saw the graphs of spectrum changes from Carbon Dioxide. Then I recalled that Hansen said that an interaction between Caron Dioxide, a trace gas, and water vapor in cloud formation was needed, and the non-signal from satellites continued. Nobody claimed Climate Change violated God's word. People do say that all research supported by Oil companies has to be rejected because Oil Companies have not been ordained in the Climate Change Sect. The religious component of the Climate Change resides in the followers of Hansen. It is a shame that NCSE conflates the science of evolution with the hype of Climate Change. And that Mark, above, says in effect that all statement, particularly about evolution, are just religion.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theory of evolution was possible once people started to understand geological time. Billions of years would allow adaption to chance events to sculpt the beautiful interrelations of species in the world. Critics said the word of God as expressed in the bible should be taken literally. Evolution is not religion in any sense of the word. </p> <p>Climate change skepticism isn’t the same. The argument is that conclusions from climate change research are not robust. The Hockey Stick was a spurious result from pounding too hard on the data. I though that one could put gases into a container and measure the change in spectrum between incoming light and transmitted light. Such data could be fed into super computers and implications drawn. I was willing to let others do the actual calculations as my PC is not quite a super computer.</p> <p>I was disappointed when I saw the graphs of spectrum changes from Carbon Dioxide. Then I recalled that Hansen said that an interaction between Caron Dioxide, a trace gas, and water vapor in cloud formation was needed, and the non-signal from satellites continued. Nobody claimed Climate Change violated God’s word. People do say that all research supported by Oil companies has to be rejected because Oil Companies have not been ordained in the Climate Change Sect. The religious component of the Climate Change resides in the followers of Hansen.</p> <p>It is a shame that NCSE conflates the science of evolution with the hype of Climate Change. And that Mark, above, says in effect that all statement, particularly about evolution, are just religion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: Mark </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2012/01/teaching-against-climate-change-deniers/#comment-7785</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:40:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=10075#comment-7785</guid> <description><![CDATA[And, according to their form 990 (Schedule A, Part II, Section A, Line 6), they have received over $4 million in public support (i.e., the government). How much do YOU guys get? (Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!) This for a "non profit" that has as its main purpose is to keep evolution in science high school classes (which sounds kind of like a religious viewpoint to me).]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, according to their form 990 (Schedule A, Part II, Section A, Line 6), they have received over $4 million in public support (i.e., the government).</p> <p>How much do YOU guys get? (Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!)</p> <p>This for a “non profit” that has as its main purpose is to keep evolution in science high school classes (which sounds kind of like a religious viewpoint to me).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>