<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel> <title> Comments on: House GOP wastes year: No significant EPA riders in budget omnibus </title> <atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2011/12/house-gop-wastes-year-no-significant-epa-riders-in-budget-omnibus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>https://junkscience.com/2011/12/house-gop-wastes-year-no-significant-epa-riders-in-budget-omnibus/</link> <description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 20:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod> hourly </sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency> 1 </sy:updateFrequency> <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator> <item> <title> By: Dennis Martin </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2011/12/house-gop-wastes-year-no-significant-epa-riders-in-budget-omnibus/#comment-6191</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis Martin]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:41:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=7911#comment-6191</guid> <description><![CDATA[n.ancy you assume that EPA protects our health and environment. History suggest that they are only interested in power and the means to gather power for power's sake. What insecticides are you talking about? Not DDT? As that myth has been broken a long time ago. What rivers are you talking about? It seems you go to extremes in your examples. Being stewards of the earth is only one responsibility. And it is questionable that government protects our health or welfare. Remember that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n.ancy you assume that EPA protects our health and environment. History suggest that they are only interested in power and the means to gather power for power’s sake. What insecticides are you talking about? Not DDT? As that myth has been broken a long time ago. What rivers are you talking about? It seems you go to extremes in your examples. Being stewards of the earth is only one responsibility. And it is questionable that government protects our health or welfare. Remember that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: n. ancy </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2011/12/house-gop-wastes-year-no-significant-epa-riders-in-budget-omnibus/#comment-6190</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[n. ancy]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:33:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=7911#comment-6190</guid> <description><![CDATA[Are you all nuts? EPA protects our health and environment. This is the job of good government. I don't want to go back to a time when rivers caught on fire, insecticides were killing off birds, we had no protection from heavy metals in our air, water or soil, and many cities were so filled with smog and particulate that entire generations of children grew up with lungs like smokers. Look, we have a responsibility to maintain our earth for generations to come, and to protect human health and welfare. I don't understand why this has become a negative thing]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you all nuts? EPA protects our health and environment. This is the job of good government. I don’t want to go back to a time when rivers caught on fire, insecticides were killing off birds, we had no protection from heavy metals in our air, water or soil, and many cities were so filled with smog and particulate that entire generations of children grew up with lungs like smokers.</p> <p>Look, we have a responsibility to maintain our earth for generations to come, and to protect human health and welfare. I don’t understand why this has become a negative thing</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: jameshrust </title> <link>https://junkscience.com/2011/12/house-gop-wastes-year-no-significant-epa-riders-in-budget-omnibus/#comment-6189</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[jameshrust]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:18:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=7911#comment-6189</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is waste of money for EPA foolishness written about. How about the loss of money by not building Keystone XL. Also, has any headway been achieved in stopping these total loss of money in subsidies for solar, wind, and biofuels. Billions have been lost. The Republicans could have at least made President Obama veto some bills to show where he stands on energy policy. Now Obama can argue the Republicans support his energy policies that are ruining the country.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is waste of money for EPA foolishness written about. How about the loss of money by not building Keystone XL. Also, has any headway been achieved in stopping these total loss of money in subsidies for solar, wind, and biofuels. Billions have been lost. The Republicans could have at least made President Obama veto some bills to show where he stands on energy policy. Now Obama can argue the Republicans support his energy policies that are ruining the country.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>