<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fizzle: Alarmist academics doubt impact from Muller	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://junkscience.com/2011/10/fizzle-alarmist-academics-doubt-impact-from-muller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://junkscience.com/2011/10/fizzle-alarmist-academics-doubt-impact-from-muller/</link>
	<description>All the junk that’s fit to debunk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 05:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lawrie		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2011/10/fizzle-alarmist-academics-doubt-impact-from-muller/#comment-4584</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 05:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=4294#comment-4584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aaron McCright, a Michigan State University sociologist, said the report would ultimately have little effect on public discourse, mostly because Muller and his team chose to publish its results before they underwent the review process. This undermined the report’s credibility, he said, and gave anti-climate science voices a chance to distort it.” 

This guy is obviously an unbiased observer. Us anti science types find that other anti science scientist Judith Curry, who has questioned Muller&#039;s findings, is a voice of reason.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron McCright, a Michigan State University sociologist, said the report would ultimately have little effect on public discourse, mostly because Muller and his team chose to publish its results before they underwent the review process. This undermined the report’s credibility, he said, and gave anti-climate science voices a chance to distort it.” </p>
<p>This guy is obviously an unbiased observer. Us anti science types find that other anti science scientist Judith Curry, who has questioned Muller&#8217;s findings, is a voice of reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gene		</title>
		<link>https://junkscience.com/2011/10/fizzle-alarmist-academics-doubt-impact-from-muller/#comment-4583</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://junkscience.com/?p=4294#comment-4583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Berkleys reputation as a radical liberal leftist institution has destroyed
the credibility of its graduates, professors and the school itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berkleys reputation as a radical liberal leftist institution has destroyed<br />
the credibility of its graduates, professors and the school itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>