Tag Archives: geoengineering

Idea, once ridiculed, could become reality

A controversial idea to brake global warming, first floated by the father of the hydrogen bomb, is affordable and technically feasible, but its environmental impact remains unknown, a trio of US scientists say. Continue reading

About these ads

“Sunshade” to fight climate change costed at $5 bln a year

Uh-huh… and what is the cost in lost primary productivity. That’s actually not easy to work out because lumber trees might actually grow better due to scattering allowing greater insolation of the forest understory while field crops would likely fare worse due to loss of net insolation. Also places experiencing drought could claim it’s due to reduced insolation reducing evaporation and storm formation and so on. Developing an agreed regime and compensation structure for the inevitable losers from such “climate interference” should prove far more entertaining than such a simple instrument as Kyoto and Son of Kyoto. How’s that popping corn crop coming along? Continue reading

Luboš Motl: Stratospheric geoengineering: undoing global warming costs below $8 bn/year

Bits of ScienceRevmodo, and Fars News talk about a new Aurora-Harvard-Carnegie paper in Environmental Research Letters

Cost analysis of stratospheric albedo modification delivery systems (fulltext PDF) by Justin McClellan, David W Keith, and Jay Apt

They quantify the aircraft- or rocket-related expenses needed to undo the global warming. Continue reading

New paper proposes pumping sulfuric acid into atmosphere to fix non-existent problem

A geoengineering paper published today in Environmental Research Letters proposes spending $8 billion per year to pump 5 million tons of sulfuric acid [H2SO4] into the high atmosphere to reflect sunlight, to allegedly save the planet from the non-existent problem of anthropogenic global warming. Continue reading

Delivering solar geoengineering materials may be feasible and affordable

But is it desirable to reduce primary productivity? I think not. Continue reading

Michael D. Lemonick: Scientists Suggest ‘Cloud Brightening’ To Halt Hurricanes

And if people start interfering and reducing storm numbers and size how will that effect rainfall in the Mississippi catchment? Who gets to control what storms to “permit” and how large they can be? Continue reading

Geoengineering: Risks and benefits

Few issues arouse as much controversy in environmental circles these days as geoengineering – “technical fixes” to tackle climate change, by sucking carbon dioxide from the air or by reducing the amount of sunlight hitting the Earth. Continue reading

Experiment would test cloud geoengineering as way to slow warming

Cloud brightening, again Continue reading

Rules Lacking for Geoengineering Projects for Global Warming

What if someone wanted to deploy a massive project to try to reverse climate change today? Perhaps some researchers wanted to spray sulfur particles into the stratosphere to reflect away some of the sun’s energy, cooling the Earth in an attempt to compensate for global warming. Continue reading

Scientist: The Guardian Article About Me Was ‘Substantially Fabricated’*

We received a statement from Harvard press office about Keith’s work and his response to the Guardian article and thought we should share it with you. Continue reading

How Far Should we Go to Battle Climate Change?

That really depends on what happens. If cooling gets too serious we could probably discolor snow fields fairly easily to discourage onset of major glaciation. Whatever the best course remains maximized development and wealth creation. Not what they are talking about here though. Continue reading

Geoengineering Could Backfire, Make Climate Change Worse

Oh noes! Virtual realm problem not solved by virtual realm fix! What are we going to do? Continue reading

US geoengineers to spray sun-reflecting chemicals from balloon

Experiment in New Mexico will try to establish the possibility of cooling the planet by dispersing sulphate aerosols

Do those of us who don’t want the planet cooler get a say? Continue reading

Geoengineering trial cancelled: more regulation needed

Inventors have long been protecting their ideas by filing patent applications on new technologies. But is it appropriate for researchers or companies to own the intellectual property rights to climate-altering technologies? Continue reading

Space mirrors will dry out US and Eurasia

INSTALLING huge mirrors in space would help reverse global warming, but they would come at a price: less rain for the Americas and northern Eurasia. Continue reading

Researchers can’t regulate climate engineering alone

Political interests, not scientists or inventors, will be the biggest influence on technologies to counter climate change, says Jason Blackstock. Continue reading

Geoengineering could disrupt rainfall patterns

Yes, there’s a very high likelihood of that occurring. In fact it’s about the only legitimate reason to engage in geoengineering. Continue reading

Geoengineering for Global Warming: Increasing Aerosols in Atmosphere Would Make Sky Whiter

One idea for fighting global warming is to increase the amount of aerosols in the atmosphere, scattering incoming solar energy away from Earth’s surface. Continue reading

Sunscreen in the Sky? Reflective Particles May Combat Warming

Titanium dioxide could scatter sunlight and cool Earth, scientist says.

And as an added bonus would reduce crop yields and make solar “power” even less useful than it is now ;) Continue reading

A charter for geoengineering

A controversial field trial of technology to mitigate climate change has been cancelled, but research continues. A robust governance framework is sorely needed to prevent further setbacks.

Yes! That’s the spirit! You guys keep talking about it. Preferably forever. Just don’t do anything, alright? Continue reading