Comments for JunkScience.com

Comment on Soured Hopes for Sweet Crop by fletch92131

fletch92131 — Mon, 28 May 2012 22:00:55 +0000

More BS from the decignated “California Environmentalists”, destined to do nothing of any real helpfulness for anything, “Does DDT sound familiar?”

Comment on Alex Pourbaix: Greens think more supply raises prices by ralphcramdo

ralphcramdo — Mon, 28 May 2012 21:47:14 +0000

Sorry OT, but,
I just noticed that Discovery has quietly dropped their Planet Green HD channel. It’s now Destination America HD. That won’t make greenies happy.

Comment on Terence Corcoran: A peek into Bruce Lourie’s Ontario world of green political networks by kuhnkat

kuhnkat — Mon, 28 May 2012 20:35:07 +0000

Try that link again:
http://freewco.blogspot.ca/2012/05/environmental-don-or-el-hefe-of.html

Comment on Terence Corcoran: A peek into Bruce Lourie’s Ontario world of green political networks by kuhnkat

kuhnkat — Mon, 28 May 2012 20:34:27 +0000

Gotta bad link under “here.”

http://http//freewco.blogspot.ca/2012/05/environmental-don-or-el-hefe-of.html

Should be:
http://reewco.blogspot.ca/2012/05/environmental-don-or-el-hefe-of.html

Comment on Juliet Eilperin: Book review: Michael Mann’s ‘The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars’ by Russell C

Russell C — Mon, 28 May 2012 18:54:47 +0000

The point of Eilpern’s review is that the “science is settled, skeptics are corrupt, and the media shouldn’t give fair balance to corrupt skeptics” – that latter point nicely noted in her reference to Max Boykoff. That’s the same guy involved in circular references with anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan, as I detailed in my 2011 article, ” ‘Media Too Fair to Climate Skeptics’, say reporters who’ve been unfair to skeptics” http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/02/media-too-fair-to-climate-skeptics-say-reporters-whove-been-unfair-to-skeptics/

It’s all these people have, a one-trick pony mantra designed to prompt the public to ignore skeptics that was very likely consolidated by Gelbspan around 1995-6. As long as the general public continues to accept Eilperin’s and so many others’ regurgitation of this mantra without questioning it, the issue is not won.

Comment on Opinion: Canada’s mass firing of ocean scientists brings ‘silent summer’ by Ben of Houston

Ben of Houston — Mon, 28 May 2012 17:16:08 +0000

You know, they talk about scientists, and then parade list list of accomplishments that are almost entirely junk scares worthy of the National Enquirer.

Now, if they were researching better methods of sewage digestion, potable water systems, oil/water recovery systems, or actually helping the environment instead of self-perpetuating “research” that tells us nothing about the environment or helping it, they might still have their jobs.

Comment on Jo Nova: Man-made sea-level rises are due to global adjustments by Gamecock

Gamecock — Mon, 28 May 2012 16:47:14 +0000

A corollary of Parkinson’s Law.

In the case of marriage, the wife’s expenditures rise to EXCEED the available income.

Comment on Opinion: Canada’s mass firing of ocean scientists brings ‘silent summer’ by Cat

Cat — Mon, 28 May 2012 16:45:57 +0000

Yes! Yes! Yes!

Comment on India may bar Europe carriers in climate tax row by Cat

Cat — Mon, 28 May 2012 16:44:28 +0000

We’re Canadians. We like to be taxed! We have the balls of gerbils!

Comment on Famed hurricane forecaster Dr. William Gray predicts below-average hurricane activity for 2012 & global cooling over next 20 years by Allen Brooks

Allen Brooks — Mon, 28 May 2012 16:43:45 +0000

Without any real hurricanes to rant about, the media has a new tactic, “newspeak”. This last week a low pressure center off the east coast has been re-named a SUB-tropical storm!

Comment on Krugman: scientists should falsely predict alien invasion by Allen Brooks

Allen Brooks — Mon, 28 May 2012 16:36:57 +0000

If the big green men from planet earth can’t do the job maybe the little green men from Mars can.

Comment on Alex Pourbaix: Greens think more supply raises prices by Eric Baumholer

Eric Baumholer — Mon, 28 May 2012 16:12:10 +0000

In one sense it’s true that Keystone XL is not a magic bullet on gasoline prices. If overseas prices are good enough, Keystone crude/refined products *will* be exported. To a great extent, US consumer prices of gas are determined by world demand and world prices.

Another and related factor is the value of the US dollar. As a currency, its value is going down because of Grecian deficit spending. So it takes more dollars to buy a barrel of crude, or a gallon of gasoline. Keystone can’t fix dollar inflation either.

With the NRDC involved, the questions are, who is paying them and what are the intended results. These people don’t work for free.

Comment on IBD: U.N. Law Of The Sea Treaty Must Be Stopped by tomwys

tomwys — Mon, 28 May 2012 15:59:10 +0000

Each, every, no, in fact, ALL departed Admirals, Captains, Officers, and seamen and Waves who took part in our nation’s glorious naval history, are now spinning in their graves at the mere consideration of ratification.

Hear long, the cries of our late beloved naval heros – and listen!!!

Comment on India may bar Europe carriers in climate tax row by tomwys

tomwys — Mon, 28 May 2012 15:46:22 +0000

Right now, Europeans are lending Greece money so that the Greeks can continue paying interest on the bonds/loans sold/owed to Europeans. They’ve kissed the principal goodbye, and the Europeans are desperate for revenue. So taxing foreigners (non EU) using climate or anything else as a pretext, is fair game in their eyes.

I applaud the mettle of the Chinese and Indians in standing up to this trade and tourism impairment, and bemoan the lack courage of Canadians, US, and the rest of the Americas (Caribbean, Central, and South) in not suggesting a DOUBLE retaliatory tax on the EU!!!

Comment on Jo Nova: $700,000 for believers to convert skeptics – but nothing for skeptical science by Cat

Cat — Mon, 28 May 2012 14:57:55 +0000

……should read “the aim of the prophet”…..

Comment on Alex Pourbaix: Greens think more supply raises prices by scizzorbill

scizzorbill — Mon, 28 May 2012 14:43:24 +0000

Greens don’t use reason, logic, or common sense in their thinking process. For many of them, this is difficult, causes confusion, and/or a headache. Better to use the emotional center of their psyche to construct their own dream world where they are always correct.

Comment on Jo Nova: Man-made sea-level rises are due to global adjustments by scizzorbill

scizzorbill — Mon, 28 May 2012 14:28:21 +0000

The old adage: ‘expenses rise to meet income’ can be used as a format in this case. ‘data rises to meet agenda’.

Comment on Hans Joachim Schellnhuber wants stronger green hammer by RichW

RichW — Mon, 28 May 2012 13:35:44 +0000

Much as I’d like to believe that positions like Schellnhuber’s are a result of ignorance, having spent some time studying their stated long term goals, I think they take the stands they take out of knowledge. They know that you need powerful governments with strong centralized control to perform the genocide that they desire.

Comment on Alex Pourbaix: Greens think more supply raises prices by sean2829

sean2829 — Mon, 28 May 2012 13:17:51 +0000

Not a fan of NRDC but look at the logistics and a little recent history. For years, WTI and the more global Brent crude price tracked in a narrow range. For the last coupld of years, the spread between the two has widened to over $25 a barrel at times. Production from the US (which has increased its crude production quite substantially) and Canada likely drove this. The only reason I can think of for this gap in prices is that there is no efficient way to get that crude on the global market, particularly the far east. By the time the Keystone pipeline is done, the Panama Canal will be widened so the price will be leveled. Also, keep in mind that the US became a net exporter of refined petroleum products last year. So once the pipeline is complete, there will be an efficient way for most of the crude in north America to reach the gulf coast refiners. Offshore imports for crude will fall because the crude will be sourced more locally and the refiners add value to that crude in the form of refined products and be shipped all over the world. This will reduce the gap between WTI and Brent but I suspect Amercans in the middle of the country will probably see prices rise a bit as a result.

Comment on Memorial Day, 2012 by LuisaDownUnder

LuisaDownUnder — Mon, 28 May 2012 12:53:14 +0000

Vaclav Klaus is an insightful man.
We were worried about World War III. It appears it has already started. Our freedom is at stake. Many people will die on the altar of man-made global warming but they will not receive any mention in the future for the ultimate sacrifice they will have made.
Their sacrifice will be indeed for naught.

Comment on Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy by Eric Baumholer

Eric Baumholer — Mon, 28 May 2012 12:51:59 +0000

From the abstract: “Members of the public with the highest degrees of science literacy and technical reasoning capacity were not the most concerned about climate change. Rather, they were the ones among whom cultural polarization was greatest.”

Parse this carefully. The more scientifically literate people are not concerned. There is a schism between the literate and illiterate. We will call this cultural polarization so that we can point fingers at the political incorrectness of the scientifically literate.

This is spin crap from Yale, where climatology is bought and paid for by Al Gore.

Comment on James S. Robbins: Signing America’s ‘thank you’ card by LuisaDownUnder

LuisaDownUnder — Mon, 28 May 2012 12:39:30 +0000

Unfortunately, I do remember incidences such as described. No “Welcome Home” rallies for these returned soldiers who fought a war of such savagery that they have difficulty talking about it to this day.
They were vilified, spat on, ridiculed and insulted.
I am talking from an Australian perspective, so I cannot speak for how America treated her returned soldiers from Vietnam.
The trade union officials in this country organized rallies and mob-like protests when Australia’s soldiers returned. These protests were filled with people full of hatred and viciousness for these remarkable men and women.
To this day I am ashamed of this display and I am sorry that the many people in the union movement and the Labor Party (our equivalent of your Democrats), who were involved in these shameful protests, have not been made to apologize. Their conduct is despicable.
I, too, admire and respect and thank all who served and are serving our countries.

Comment on Krugman: scientists should falsely predict alien invasion by Eric Baumholer

Eric Baumholer — Mon, 28 May 2012 12:37:16 +0000

The alien invasion idea is actually pretty good. After all, such an invasion cannot be ruled out. This means, claims about the invasion are not immediately false. The invasion could actually also be anthropogenic, with us blanketing the Earth with radio signals, which might well elicit their unkindly intentions. And there would be good money behind mitigating radio emissions. Benefits for human health, too, with cell phones causing brain damage and cancer, etc.

Comment on Patrick Sawer: Lottery funding for anti-GM activists by Eric Baumholer

Eric Baumholer — Mon, 28 May 2012 12:24:35 +0000

Why these people need government subsidies is not immediately apparent. If you want a real return on your activist investment, go with WWF or the Fiends of the Earth.

Comment on Juliet Eilperin: Book review: Michael Mann’s ‘The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars’ by Eric Baumholer

Eric Baumholer — Mon, 28 May 2012 12:16:18 +0000

For the warmists, it never really was about the CO2. Now we have a warmist book review, and it actually is not about the book.

Comment on Robert F. Turner: ‘Welcome home’ Vietnam veterans by ralphcramdo

ralphcramdo — Mon, 28 May 2012 12:08:05 +0000

Why did we get involved with Vietnam?
To stop the spread of communism.

What’s the government in Vietnam today?
Communist.

All those soldiers killed for no reason.

Comment on Krugman: scientists should falsely predict alien invasion by ralphcramdo

ralphcramdo — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:53:59 +0000

I’m starting to think that people who predict global disasters are in reality displaced hollywood script writers that lost their jobs due to the popularity and low production costs of reality based shows.

Comment on Opinion: Canada’s mass firing of ocean scientists brings ‘silent summer’ by Eric Baumholer

Eric Baumholer — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:52:02 +0000

These irrelevant jobs were at risk from the very beginning.

Comment on Hans Joachim Schellnhuber wants stronger green hammer by Eric Baumholer

Eric Baumholer — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:46:59 +0000

Apparently he didn’t learn anything from Europe’s experiment with collective government .

Comment on India may bar Europe carriers in climate tax row by ralphcramdo

ralphcramdo — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:45:10 +0000

“We will take retaliatory actions to counter steps taken by the EU”
India has nukes :O

Comment on Radon gas warnings in Aberdeenshire and Highlands by Bob

Bob — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:39:03 +0000

Another one of those scarey stories without much in the way of data. “higher than normal” radon means what? Is it above the safe levels? Just how many deaths/cases of lung cancer in Scotland are linked to radon exposure? Venting the basement to reduce radon exposure isn’t a big deal and had been around for quite some time. Glad it has finally made it to Scotland.

Comment on Anti-GM wheat protest halted by police by Bob

Bob — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:30:17 +0000

And just what is this GM contamination supposed to do? Aren’t the current hybrids genetic modifications by slower means?

Comment on Ethanol-based fuel set to make Indy 500 debut by ralphcramdo

ralphcramdo — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:24:48 +0000

Alcohol has been used for decades in Indy and drag racing. It’s nothing new, but some greenie gets a thrill making it seem like Indy racing is doing something to help the environment and promote biofuels.

Comment on Opinion: Canada’s mass firing of ocean scientists brings ‘silent summer’ by ralphcramdo

ralphcramdo — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:19:02 +0000

Hey Pete, GET A JOB!

Comment on Tropical dams are a false solution to climate change by ralphcramdo

ralphcramdo — Mon, 28 May 2012 11:08:58 +0000

A typical greenie response to a non-problem.

Comment on Irish Times: Republican Party too ‘wacko’ to still be considered mainstream by edwardgallagher

edwardgallagher — Mon, 28 May 2012 10:59:28 +0000

The really sad part of the commentary is the blissful ignorance of the writer as to what the Republican party has been about in historical terms. The party is hardly defined by the likes GW, or John McCain. The republican party has always had at its base a capitalist free market philosophy that says the individual should be free to pursue his goals and to keep the profits of his labors. As opposed to the leftist philosophy that see the individual as one oxen in a long line of controlled cattle. Republicans view the state as a servant and the individual as sovereign, the opposite of socialists. Republicans look upon taxes as a necessary evil to pay for services while socialists look upon taxes as a method to force compliance with a philosophy and to “spread the wealth” earned by others, while maintaining an elitist upper class based on an assumed moral superiority with nothing to back up that assumption. Republicans believe in charity, socialists believe in entitlements. Republicans recognize the difference between equality of opportunity and equality of results.

Comment on Computer model pinpoints prime materials for efficient carbon capture by Westchester Bill

Westchester Bill — Mon, 28 May 2012 10:57:17 +0000

CO2 gas is in a high entropy state. There are fundamental energy costs to putting CO2 into a solid form. I doubt if that bar can be met in a reasonable way.

Comment on Ethanol-based fuel set to make Indy 500 debut by Gamecock

Gamecock — Mon, 28 May 2012 10:43:43 +0000

Indy cars have been running alcohol for decades. This is actually retrograde (as far as the greenies should be concerned).

Comment on Pat Brennan: In new film, UCI prof warns of water crisis by Gamecock

Gamecock — Mon, 28 May 2012 10:35:21 +0000

California’s water situation has always been tenuous. No climate change needed.

Fortunately, Sacramento is doing what is necessary to substantially reduce the population. Reckless spending, high taxes, strangling regulation is paying off.

Comment on Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy by Gamecock

Gamecock — Mon, 28 May 2012 10:26:55 +0000

They presume it’s about “scientific information.”

The study presumes that people who dismiss their scientific information are defective. The study is to select between two defects.

Comment on Greens warn of a return to era of ‘dirty coal’ by Silberstein, Jek

Silberstein, Jek — Mon, 28 May 2012 09:50:34 +0000

Coal can, through lots of pressure, yield a clean-burning gas or petroleum products. Building “cracking-plants” would provide lots of refinery-building jobs, which could be taxed, plus lots of steel would be needed to withstand the pressures of cracking coal to fuels. With scrubbers, a coal-slurry would be cleaner than just a straight coal-burn, but the British govt. has probably promised all of its funds for windmills,–if not the construction of them,–than the subsidies for them once they’re built. To have wind power, is to ALSO HAVE to build “back-up” gas-fired generators to provide up to 90% of all of the output from windmill(s). The coal, cracked, could FUEL those gas-”back-up” generators, but the chain of steel, then refineries, to get gas, would be impractical compared to simply drilling in Britian for shale-gas. CNG is a cold liquid that performs a hydraulic-function, fracturing the shales, and releasing the gas trapped in those shales. CNG warms after used for fracking, and turns into a lighter-than-air-vapor, following the shale gas up to the well-head, and preventing ANY contamination of water tables. The Greens should push for shale-gas to burn in gas-plants for power-generation. Because some Greens are protecting Russian-gas “interests”,or aresimply neo-Luddites, they’ll probably resist fracking, even with CNG. Due to new technology, the Oil/gas outfits want to “hook-up” people with energy from known sources before they figure-out how to drill for their own. A HUGE BOOM in Energies will allow the USA to pay-off ALL of its debts, if the BilderBORGers have their EPA-”dog” chained & Muzzled,–its Kenyan-boy President retired to later ruin the U.N.(–which will be Easy as the U.N. is already ruined, imo). Soros “owns” Nobama, so Nobama’ll resist domestic drilling/development if he gets a second-term, via a “hack” into SCYTL. The Powers-That-Be have to DEMAND that the Demoncrats “dump” Nobama for Clinton, so that the Demoncrats can continue to compete with Republicans. If Nobama “steps-down”, our next President is Hillary(Bill) Clinton, because a hack on SCYTL will “work” for her, too. As a moderate and a Centrist, Ramney doesn’t have a chance with a SCYTL-hack, that turns his “landslide” into a “Nobama/Clinton-Mandate” with a single key-stroke. Imo, with SCYTL holding the USA vote, NO Republican President can win, even if Jesus Christ was “Running with the Elephants!” As there’s NO AGW, it really doesn’t matter what the British do,–it’s their country. The cheapest, CLEANEST solution is NOT wind/coal-gas, but simply shale-gas, using CNG as a non-polluting fracking medium. An expensive but much better solution than wind/gas is nuclear, via Thorium-fueled LFTRs .

Comment on James S. Robbins: Signing America’s ‘thank you’ card by bill10526

bill10526 — Mon, 28 May 2012 09:45:18 +0000

When I was a kid on every Halloween there would be a piece the local news about glass in candy and razor blades in apples. “Be careful children!” One fellow wondered about the people who put the razor blades in apples. They must be strange ducks. When that reporter man sought out an actual case, he found nothing at all. The glass in the candy was sugar that separated out from candy that was heated and cooled, and a cold crisp apple will cause gums to bleed.

So it is with the “spat on” charge and Vietnam vets. There was never an actual case of that.

My understanding is that the United States and Vietnam are friends and that the refugees from Vietnam to the United States are terrific citizens. Let’s not re-litigate the war issue. The left complained of American savagery in the war, but what gets me is General Giap’s use of men like matchsticks and the holocaust-level brutality of the Khmer Rouge.

I was lucky and not called to Vietnam, but I admire and thank all who, like my dad, have served and are serving our country.

Comment on NASA hit for sloppy hyping of global warming by Icarus62

Icarus62 — Mon, 28 May 2012 09:38:33 +0000

It’s largely by studying the response of climate to natural forcings that we know what to expect from anthropogenic forcings. Don’t forget that human activity is now the dominant influence on global climate.

Comment on Memorial Day, 2012 by omanuel

omanuel — Mon, 28 May 2012 04:25:33 +0000

As we pay tribute to citizens who made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve our freedoms this Memorial Day week-end, it is fitting to read the speech by Czech President, Václav Klaus, regarding Climategate and the threat that it poses to our most basic freedoms:

http://tinyurl.com/87qeycz

“It is evident that the current temperature data confirm neither the GWD alarmist and apocalyptic views, nor their quasi-scientific hypotheses about the exclusivity of relationship between CO2 and temperature.”

“What is Endangered: Climate or Freedom? There is no doubt that it is all about freedom. We should keep that in mind.”

- Václav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic,
21 May 2012

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
http://www.omatumr.com
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-70

Comment on Genetically modified food labels continue to be pushed by concerned activists by ECK

ECK — Mon, 28 May 2012 02:30:54 +0000

This is nonsense. But most people are ignorant or just plain stupid. ALL of our food is genetically modified. What the kooks are complaing about are transgenic modification. Let them show any evidence that there’s a difference. They can’t there’s no evidence, or for that matter, any good reason to suspect so.

Comment on Irish Times: Republican Party too ‘wacko’ to still be considered mainstream by Editor

Editor — Sun, 27 May 2012 23:20:03 +0000

But Marilyn, the very definition of wacko is repeatedly performing the same actions and expecting a different outcome, e.g. Socialists thinking “it will work this time”. Republicans (as opposed RINOs) can generally be grouped as free market capitalists and, as such, object strenuously to the market deformations and crony capitalism which creates the financial havoc you mention.

Neither do Republicans favor laissez-faire industry but you confuse misanthropic environmentalism with clean industry – I’d guess you are too young to remember industrial clean-up predates environmentalism, although enviros now fraudulently try to claim the mantle of “saviors”. The real heavy lifting was accomplished in the late 1940s and 1950s, largely to address such problems as London’s killer smogs. By the ’70s most of the older, dirtier industrial plants were reaching the end of their useful lifespans and being replaced by cleaner plants and processes, something that would actually be proceeding more quickly today were it not for greenie obstructionists. Regardless it is wealth generation which makes environmental protection affordable and desirable (people who lack basic nutrition, fuel and shelter can not view their environment as anything other than a source of calories and raw material). Capitalism is the only way to protect the planet and capitalism’s natural home is the center-right of politics – ground occupied by those “wacko” Republicans.

Finally you appear to confuse carbon dioxide emission with “pollution”, something which demonstrates how truly indoctrinated you are. I hope you hang around, read and think – certainly further than “Republicans are wacko”.

Comment on Genetically modified food labels continue to be pushed by concerned activists by dd

dd — Sun, 27 May 2012 20:14:32 +0000

Simple solution, let it happen and the price of non-GMO foods will skyrocket and/or no farmer will produce them because they won’t be able to due to disease and pest. Let the activists starve.

Comment on NASA hit for sloppy hyping of global warming by jarmo

jarmo — Sun, 27 May 2012 18:10:37 +0000

“…considering what’s at stake.”
Why not just spell it out. Sound the alarm. The sky will fall on us. Like your namesake and other government-supported scientists, you are ignoring the power of the sun and other not well understood factors. The “settled science” of global warming has become a religion, cloaked in “high morality and responsibility”.

Comment on Is China poor? Key question at climate talks by Rainer

Rainer — Sun, 27 May 2012 17:45:12 +0000

China is considered a rich country, by far richer than any European country, by Adam Smith in his famous book The Wealth Of Nations. That book was published in 1776.

Comment on Irish Times: Republican Party too ‘wacko’ to still be considered mainstream by guest-comment

guest-comment — Sun, 27 May 2012 17:40:41 +0000

The focus of the comment by the Irish Times is that the Republican image is off the deep end wacko! The Irish Times LISTS wacko ideas Republican politicians claim to support– assuming Republicans really are that mentally compromised, but I think Republicans are acting, merely broadcasting beliefs of mainstream voters who claim Republican identities – to get their votes. That’s the Republican Party strategy. Wacko George Bush! Wacko John McCain! Wacko politics!! ..stupid as foxes!The goal of politicians is to appeal to a block of people to get elected. It’s the republican populace that is wacko.
Goals versus strategy! To see what the actual goals of Republican apparatchik are, you have to look at what they do (first Christian rule: look at what they do).
BOTH parties are dependent on corporations to finance their campaigns. Politicians who make it to the elections are vetted, representing rich corporations; and you see what has been done since Reagan, rolling back regulations to enable financial institutions freedom from ethics; thus, to bundle unsecured loans and sell them worldwide, making a killing while the bottom of real estate drops out of sight, forcing the loss of millions of American homes, forcing banks and corporations into bankruptcy worldwide, causing a global depression; or look at what Romney did at Bain Capital, laying off multi-thousands of people, moving millions from the companies into his wallet before filing companies into bankruptcies.
The other goal to eliminate ALL environment regulations enabling corporations, such as the Koch Brothers Industries, not to clean up their pollution and avoid accountability to the American people, putting the money into their own wallets while making all of us ill (i.e., their schtick: no global warming, a conspiracy theory, Scientists versus Christianity).
You should be able to see that UNLESS you’re too busy loyally cheering or accusing the opposing ‘team.’ Rah!
That’s the intellect of the mainstream republican wacko – mind deficit, loyal cheerleader for the team – which is just so amazing to the Irish press that anyone could POSSIBLY be THAT mentally compromised.
So continue to avoid looking at what you’re supporting –so you can avoid asking what the Irish Press was thinking.