So here comes a medical study with plenty of power–40,000 subjects so it has statistical significance. HOWEVER!!!!
Category Archives: Scientific method
If I kill you with a knife, is that the beginning of a knife epidemic? Huh?
We have mentioned many times before the corrupting effect of government grants on climate and environmental research.
Sierra Rayne discusses, and points out Oregon has had no warming or changes in weather.
Here he comes today with two debunks of the media warming ninnies.
Look at this study, and see if you see what I see. This is a problem with these food magic risk assessment studies.
Howard Hayden, physicist, Prof U Conn, reads the NYT and alerted me to this piece. Thanks.
This essay and profile is pretty fair, although Wines gives entirely too much space to the intolerant fanatics who are at the climate funding trough.
I am a big fan of physicist Howard Hayden, formerly Prof at U Conn, so I ask you to consider some of his comments from the July issue of The Energy Advocate</em, a real paper newsletter he publishes.
I am chuckling to think that such things could be said by the left.
Well it’s true they cannot re write statutes, they can “interpret” them in ways that boggle the mind.
Seismic blasting to study the ocean floor off New Jersey to study ocean floor sediments from up to 60 million years ago seems to be ready to go despite protests. Continue reading
I admire a certain writer who puts up this fine piece on why small particles–tiny dust–don’t kill nobody the way the EPA claims.
Climate is so complex that Roy Spencer thinks we should show a little humility.
Cosmic accounting shows an enormous deficit in UV light. Actual versus model. Continue reading
So here I go again. I am an equal opportunity food and wine editor–Chianti and other red wines are not magic unless used to charm your beloved, certainly not like the health food nuts would claim.
Ok, an objective judge, reviewing the evidence, would allow a claim against Greenpeace for disrupting economies in a criminal conspiracy that includes gov funding of cliimate panic junk science on an enormous scale.
This paper is going to be the discussion item for this month at our journal club.
Lay people can and should understand why medical research sometimes provides guidance that is counter intuitive, at least on the surface.