For quite a few years, one of the most popular chemicals for scientific inquiry has been bisphenol A (BPA). Scientists around the world have been conducting a diverse array of studies aimed at understanding whether BPA poses a risk to human health.
Based on the weight of evidence from these many studies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently answered the question “Is BPA safe?” with a simple and unambiguous answer – “Yes.” Read more…
Posted in Bisphenol A (BPA)
Clean Air Act co-author John Dingell says Congress did not intend for EPA to regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act. Dingell says the authors didn’t think the Court was ‘stupid enough’ to think otherwise. Boy, were they wrong. The video clip is from a Jan 28, 2014 House hearing. Continue reading
Posted in 113th Congress, Climate Change, EPA
There’s no evidence to support the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) longstanding claim that fine airborne particulate matter measuring 2.5 micrograms or less (PM2.5) is killing thousands of Americans every year, according to the first comprehensive study of its kind. Continue reading
Posted in Air pollution, EPA
Airborne Fine Particulate Matter and Short-Term Mortality: Exploring the California Experience,2007-2010. Continue reading
Posted in Air pollution, EPA
University of Houston professor, climate skeptic, EnergyTribune.com editor and JunkScience.com friend Michael Economides passed away over the weekend. Economides was the first to expose the practical impossibilities of carbon capture and storage. Remember him as a champion of science. Help defeat warmism and carbon capture and storage in his memory.
Posted in From the Publisher
The Grocer reports: Continue reading
Posted in Salt
This is junk science because… Continue reading
Posted in Salt
Thank you Anthony Leiserowitz. Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
Morton Satin wants you to eat your vegetables. He wants you to consume broccoli, carrots, cabbage – all the good-for-you greens, reds and yellows out there. But most importantly, he wants you to enjoy them so you will eat them every day. And that means you must add salt. Bring that salt shaker out of hiding and start enjoying your food again, is Satin’s advice.
Who is this maverick whose concepts on salt fly in the face of years of advice handed out by most all public health institutions? Continue reading
The Guardian comments: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
The WaPo editorializes: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
Graham Readfern writes in the Guardian: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change, Media
Greg Sheridan writes in the Australian: Continue reading
Posted in Carbon Tax
The Top Ten Reasons The Government Shutdown Isn’t All Bad Continue reading
Posted in 113th Congress, EPA
The Daily Mail reports: Continue reading
Posted in Clean energy
Hard to believe taxpayers have given $350 million to these whiners to do nonsense research that returns zero to taxpayers. Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
About today’s Supreme Court decision to hear whether EPA can regulate stationary sources of CO2 (like power plants), Reuters reports: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change, EPA
BTW Ed, the EPA meetings are pro forma — i.e., designed to meet a coming court challenges to the rules, not to allow the public to weigh in. Continue reading
Posted in 113th Congress, Climate Change, EPA
The media release is below. Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
The New York Times reports: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
