Clean Air Act co-author John Dingell says Congress did not intend for EPA to regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act. Dingell says the authors didn’t think the Court was ‘stupid enough’ to think otherwise. Boy, were they wrong. The video clip is from a Jan 28, 2014 House hearing. Continue reading
Author Archives: JunkScience.com
Dingell calls Supreme Court ‘stupid’ for allowing EPA to regulate CO2
Posted in 113th Congress, Climate Change, EPA
Study: ‘No Statistical Correlation’ Between Fine Airborne Particles, Premature Death
There’s no evidence to support the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) longstanding claim that fine airborne particulate matter measuring 2.5 micrograms or less (PM2.5) is killing thousands of Americans every year, according to the first comprehensive study of its kind. Continue reading
Posted in Air pollution, EPA
EPA air pollution scare debunked by best data set ever assembled on particulate matter and deaths
Airborne Fine Particulate Matter and Short-Term Mortality: Exploring the California Experience,2007-2010. Continue reading
Posted in Air pollution, EPA
Michael Economides, RIP
University of Houston professor, climate skeptic, EnergyTribune.com editor and JunkScience.com friend Michael Economides passed away over the weekend. Economides was the first to expose the practical impossibilities of carbon capture and storage. Remember him as a champion of science. Help defeat warmism and carbon capture and storage in his memory.
Posted in From the Publisher
UK Government scraps salt reduction targets for foods
The Grocer reports: Continue reading
Posted in Salt
Claim: Medicines should be labeled for salt content
This is junk science because… Continue reading
Posted in Salt
Prominent Yale warmist admits global warming impact is ‘invisible’
Thank you Anthony Leiserowitz. Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
Experts advise taking those sodium intake recommendations with a grain of salt
Morton Satin wants you to eat your vegetables. He wants you to consume broccoli, carrots, cabbage – all the good-for-you greens, reds and yellows out there. But most importantly, he wants you to enjoy them so you will eat them every day. And that means you must add salt. Bring that salt shaker out of hiding and start enjoying your food again, is Satin’s advice.
Who is this maverick whose concepts on salt fly in the face of years of advice handed out by most all public health institutions? Continue reading
UK Paper: ‘Saving planet… will take man-on-the-moon commitment’ — But at least then we understood the physics!
The Guardian comments: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
WaPo sweats SCOTUS review of EPA authority over coal power plants — ‘pro-EPA outcome is far from guaranteed’
The WaPo editorializes: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
Warmist points out LATimes bans letters from skeptics — but prints horoscopes!
Graham Readfern writes in the Guardian: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change, Media
Must read: Aussie journo takes down carbon tax as ‘the great climate fiction’
Greg Sheridan writes in the Australian: Continue reading
Posted in Carbon Tax
Senate GOP offers ‘The Top Ten Reasons The Government Shutdown Isn’t All Bad’ — Most involve EPA, environment
The Top Ten Reasons The Government Shutdown Isn’t All Bad Continue reading
Posted in 113th Congress, EPA
European wind farm dismantled and not replaced for first time
The Daily Mail reports: Continue reading
Posted in Clean energy
Climatologist Drama Queens: Government shutdown claimed to cause ‘irreversible damage’ to ‘decades of scientific research’
Hard to believe taxpayers have given $350 million to these whiners to do nonsense research that returns zero to taxpayers. Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
Dishonest: EPA chief says Obama climate plan not threatened by SCOTUS review of EPA authority over coal plants
About today’s Supreme Court decision to hear whether EPA can regulate stationary sources of CO2 (like power plants), Reuters reports: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change, EPA
Sen. Malarkey claims shutdown prevents public from discussing EPA coal rules — But EPA propaganda tour ≠ discussion
BTW Ed, the EPA meetings are pro forma — i.e., designed to meet a coming court challenges to the rules, not to allow the public to weigh in. Continue reading
Posted in 113th Congress, Climate Change, EPA
Sea Hysteria Run: Global warming to undermine oceans by 2100 — ‘ Truly scary to consider how vast these impacts will be’
The media release is below. Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
Antarctic researchers whine about shutdown — But what do taxpayers get out of nonsense research anyway?
The New York Times reports: Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change
