Milloy puts lie to EPA air quality ‘science’ (again)

JunkScience.com readers will recall the spark that started the EPA human experiments controversy was a September 2011 study published by EPA researchers.

The study claimed that a human experiment with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) caused a cardiac arrthymia in a 58-year old obese woman with pre-existing cardiac problems.

I pointed out the bogus nature of this claim shortly after, here.

I learned today that independent researchers entirely validated my criticism in a July 2014 study published in Environmental Health Perspectives. It’s a long story of why I only discovered this today, but I’ll have to leave that for another time. But it involves the National Academy of Sciences review of EPA’s illegal human testing program.

Anyway the new study is here.

The researchers dismissed the 2011 EPA report as follows:

Screen Shot 2016-07-12 at 2.35.09 PM

15 thoughts on “Milloy puts lie to EPA air quality ‘science’ (again)”

  1. Thank you, Steven, for helping to pull the curtain on seventy years of deceit disguised as consensus science. Today another rip in the curtain of deceit appeared as researchers admitted a supposedly BLACK HOLE IS A PULSAR, a neutron star like the cores of the Sun and other ordinary stars – powered by NEUTRON REPULSION, the source of energy in the cores of U-235 & Pu-239 atoms that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 AUG 1945 & 9 AUG 1945, and allowed Stalin to “save the world from nuclear annihilation” by uniting nations and national academies of sciences into a giant, worldwide “Orwellian Ministry of Scientific (UN)Truths” on 24 OCT 1945.

    http://m.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/article/26197242/astronomen-vinden-bewijs-zwaartekrachtskolk

  2. Olive Manual: Don’t you have another conference you could go off to where you can preach your junk science non-stop to the empty chairs? It would save us from your irrelevant, smarmy and repetitive posts.

  3. Great Wallyrus…….It’s so edifying to occasionally have experts like you attempting to ridicule real scientists instead of the junk variety…
    Now you’ve repeatedly pointed out that OKM is wrong, could you please tell us all where and how he is mistaken….
    A lot of scientists are waiting for your concise revelation, or failing this, your getting lost which should be very easy for you judging by your performance so far………
    Thanks………..

  4. Thanks, Great Walrus, for your reminder of the London GeoEthics Conference on September 8-9, 2016:

    https://geoethicdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/london-prel-program-3b1.pdf

    I hope you will attend and bring with you any questions you have about Neutron Repulsion, the source of energy indelibly recorded in exact rest masses of the ~3,000 types of atoms compromising all matter.

    Neutron repulsion will be explained at 10:00 am on September 2016 and time is scheduled for any questions after the presentation.

    To prepare yourself, learn how to make 3-D correlation plots of three empirical data points defined by each of 3,000 atomic mass data points:

    1. Mass per nucleon, M/A
    2. Charge per nucleon, Z/A
    3. Mass number A = 1-300 amu

    Do least squares fitting to the Bohr-Wheeler mass parabola plot of M/A vs Z/A for the data points (~10) at each value of A.

    The Great Walrus will either confirm or deny neutron repulsion by the values he obtains for M/A at Z/A = O for each value of A.

    Thanks again, I look forward to your conclusion.

  5. Neutron repulsion will be explained at 10:00 am on September 8, 2016 and time is scheduled for any questions after the presentation.

  6. Anyone can spot check the validity of neutron repulsion by selecting and plotting the atomic mass data at any odd mass number (to avoid even-even vs odd-odd effects), e.g., A = 15, 17, 19., 21, 23, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, etc.

    At mass 27, one would only need to plot atomic rest mass data from Brookhaven Nat’l Lab for
    F-27, Ne-27, Na-27, Mg-27, Al-27, Si-27, P-27, S-27, Cl-27,

    One such simple check would allow anyone to confirm or refute neutron repulsion, if the mass parabola defined by the mass data does or does not yield a value of M/A> M/A for the free neutron at Z/A = 0.

  7. Ollie: I must remember to mark the date of your talk on my calendar, as I have had numerous burning questions about neutron repulsion since WWII ended. I can’t believe I have never thought of doing “least squares fitting to the Bohr-Wheeler mass parabola plot of M/A vs Z/A for the data points (~10) at each value of A.” No wonder I lost my job and my marriage failed. However, I don’t think the interior of the Sun could be made of iron, as that would make the Sun so heavy it would fall out of the sky and come crashing down onto Earth, and we all know that that has not happened, so it must consist of hydrogen.

    Roggie: Are you Ollie’s ex-student by any chance, or a relative? In any case, how have you dealt with the last 70 years of Stalinesque deceit? Do you try to avoid neutrons on a daily basis? Please pass on any tips.

  8. Wally:
    Thanks for actually starting a thread about OKM’s claims…
    Re your questions…
    1. Are you Ollie’s ex-student by any chance, or a relative?
    No, but I’m keen to know about the BS spread worldwide over the past 70 years about nukes in general…..There were a lot of non-sequiturs spread around by the MSM and swallowed by the public…….
    2. How have you dealt with the last 70 years of Stalinesque deceit?
    I haven’t……After reading about Kuroda I wonder if he was taking the US and OMK in particular for a ride.
    As a kid I was scared about the possibility of WW3 and no info I could find about, say, nukes or the total cost of WW2 made any sense to me…..
    3. Do you try to avoid neutrons on a daily basis?
    There would be no point, would there? A shower of slow neutrons from a neutron bomb would quickly consign any life form to history….

    No kidding, Wally; it really is refreshing to read cynical comments from an academic clever enough to appreciate he doesn’t understand aspects of alleged junk science while still being able to make jokes about it…….
    Cheers, Rog.

  9. I deeply regret that the video by Galen Winson is no longer available to the public. He worked as Safety Radiation Officer at the Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plant in Richmond, Washinhton during WWII. He reported in the video that the danger of nuclear radiation was wildely exaggerated after WWII.

    If anyone gains access Galen Winston’s video, please share it with others.

  10. Thanks, OKM…
    I started viewing the Winston video then ‘postponed’ it because it was very long………Murphy’s law again…..I don’t think I was able to save it…….Now I would benefit greatly from seeing it in full……

    Ike was no dummy…he was not made SCAFE without good reason…
    Keep up the good work…..
    Thanks,
    Rog.

  11. Five University of Missouri graduate students and I discovered Neutron Repulsion as the source of energy indelibly recorded in exact rest masses of 3,000 types of atoms that comprise all matter in 2000.

    Neutron repulsion that prevents the formation of black holes has been confirmed many times:

    http://news.mst.edu/2003/03/research_suggests_neutron_repu/

    http://m.phys.org/news/2005-12-scientist-neutron-stars-black-holes.html

    https://plus.google.com/114336944072766230184/posts/WRUkGjLm4F9

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.