Read this little exercise in immorality.
British feminist thinks killing babies based on their sex, which means well into the 1st trimester, is just fine–after all, it’s legal.
When you consider life and an individual expendable, things follow on as to how that works.
After a quality of life measure could be gender, right?
For example men don’t live so long and the feminists have declared them savaged boors. Woops, but what if the sex choice is made in cultures that prefer men?
When you affirm a women’s right to kill humans of a certain size, could you extend it to the first 30 days to fine tune the choices, like the jackass Singer from Princeton proposes.
When feminists and libs assert a right to kill do they also surrender the right to say whom can you kill–the red-headed, the runt, the girl who appears to be ugly on the Ultrasound and brunette, not blond, the boy who’s looking too short or who’s brain scan is unsatisfactory to the parents?
Of course the horrors of the Charnel House that Kermit ran in Philly–the reaction was killing live babies. Gee, don’t people realize that live is not determined by whether the baby can cry or make a noise.