More questions about the value of routine mammography

Now to be clear, when there are other indications or suspicions, a mammography generally is worthwhile. But more and more research suggests that routine screening is of questionable value.
NY Times reporter Gina Bari Kolata covers the latest British Medical Journal entry in this discussion:

“Study adds new doubts about value of Mammograms”

One of the largest and most meticulous studies of mammography ever done, involving 90,000 women and lasting a quarter century, has added powerful new doubts about the value of the screening test for women of any age.

It found that the death rates from breast cancer and from all causes were the same in women who got mammograms and those who did not. And the screening had harms — one out of five cancers found with mammography and treated was not a threat to the woman’s health and did not need treatment like chemotherapy, surgery or radiation.

About these ads

2 responses to “More questions about the value of routine mammography

  1. As governments take over paying for such things, then announce that they are of little value, I close my ears.

  2. Friend of John Galt

    Indeed! The “death panel” inside Obamacare just needs an excuse to eliminate some of the “free screening” mandated under the ACA law.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s