House Science Committee subpoenas EPA secret science

A great moment in the fight against junk science.

The House Science Committee media release is below.

###

Smith Subpoenas EPA’s Secret Science

AUG 1, 2013

Washington, D.C. – Science, Space, and Technology Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) today issued a subpoena to the EPA, forcing the agency to release the secret science it uses as the basis for costly air regulations.

Over the past two years, the Committee has repeatedly requested the data the agency uses to justify virtually every Clean Air Act regulation proposed and finalized by the Obama administration. This was the first congressional subpoena the Science Committee has issued in 21 years.

Chairman Smith: “In September 2011, the EPA’s then-Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy committed to make the data sets available to the Committee. Even though Ms. McCarthy now leads the agency, she has yet to provide the promised data to the Committee.

“This subpoena could have been avoided. Unfortunately, we’ve been put in this position by an agency that willfully disregards congressional requests and makes its rules using undisclosed data. After two years of failing to respond, it’s clear that the EPA is not going to give the American people what they deserve—the truth about regulations.

“The EPA should not base its regulations on secret data. By denying the Committee’s request, the agency prevents Congress from fulfilling its oversight responsibilities and denies the American people the ability to verify EPA’s claims. The EPA’s lack of cooperation contributes to the suspicion that the data sets do not support the agency’s actions. The American people deserve all of the facts and have a right to know whether the EPA is using good science.”

The two data sets in question are used to justify major costly new air regulations. As one example, by its own estimates the EPA’s proposed limits on ozone will cost taxpayers $90 billion per year, making it the most costly regulation the federal government has ever issued. Some of the data in question is up to 30-years-old.

Over the last two years, the Science Committee has sent six letters to the EPA and other top administration officials. But the administration has refused to substantively respond to the requests. Under the EPA’s current process, only a select few who support the EPA’s agenda are authorized to access and analyze the data. But this ignores the need for congressional oversight of taxpayer-funded research.

During the meeting, Chairman Smith made clear that any personal health information that is in the data will be protected and removed before the data is made public. He asserted that ensuring public access to taxpayer funded data that is used in regulations is good science and good government.

This afternoon, the Committee voted to approve a resolution authorizing the Chairman to issue a subpoena for the data in question. Chairman Smith subsequently signed the subpoena, which legally obliges the EPA to provide the data to the Committee.

A copy of the subpoena can be found here.

8 thoughts on “House Science Committee subpoenas EPA secret science”

  1. C’mon, you don’t seriously think they will cough up anything pertinent do you? You’re in a dream world. Obama just ignores these kind of things – tons of examples (look it up, I don’t have time). It will be the usual- stonewall/ignore – “make me, nah, nah”. With the senate in the control of the “demon-crats”, nothing, really, can be done. We’re screwed for the next 3 years. Let’s hope it can be undone (not, at all, obvious).

  2. Unfortunately, I agree. EPA will not comply with the subpoena and the House will do nothing to follow up.

  3. I’m more optimistic. Can you name anyone who has ignored a House subpoena in the past? Subpoenas are pretty serious mojo, no matter who issues them. I’m pretty sure they can jail people for contempt of Congress. The GOP dominated House will probably follow through with whatever pressure they have at their disposal. It would be fun to see a federal department head cool her heals in House’s pokey while her EPA lackeys prepare a report that fulfills the requirements of the subpoena.

  4. Yes. The current Attorney General Eric Holder not only regularly advises ignoring subpoenas he has been held in Contempt of Congress for ignoring subpoenas. This government does not care about breaking the law and does not care if we know about it. The vast majority of them, both Dem’s and Repub’s would be in jail if they acted this way as private citizens.

  5. I would like to see Congress force EPA to comply with FOIA, and expose the absence of peer reviewed science to justify any regulation of CO2, or other gasses labeled “GHG’s”. (see how EPA sleezes out of such requests at itssd.org, follow the EPA and NOAA FOIA links) Same goes for fine particulates, etc.

Comments are closed.