Columbia Journalism Review joins warmist attack on Reuters

CJR reports:

But rumblings in the Reuters newsroom signal that the most recent dip in climate coverage is accompanied by a shift in editorial angle. I spoke on background to several journalists working at Reuters, who said that since Ingrassia was hired, they’ve felt pressure from management to “balance” to climate change stories by including the views of global-warming skeptics. “I’m really glad someone outside the company is looking into this,” said one staffer who did not wish to be identified. “I think this is the most worrying thing any of us have seen here.”

Read more…

About these ads

3 responses to “Columbia Journalism Review joins warmist attack on Reuters

  1. CJR reports a Reuters staffer saying that the move to require balance in global warming stories is “the most worrying thing any of us have seen here”.

    Says all you need to know about the Columbia “Journalism” Review!

  2. This being the same CJR that couldn’t rise to the challenge of telling any of us what specific “misinformation” was being spread by conservative think-tanks. You’d think they would have that info right at their fingertips…

    “Responding to the CJR’s ‘Attack of the Climate Denial Books'” http://blog.heartland.org/2013/03/responding-to-the-cjrs-attack-of-the-climate-denial-books/

  3. @ Robert Bell

    How is seeking balance in journalism wrong ? It seems CJR is saying “balance” is unacceptable, which is whack job fringe to me…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s