Warmist WaPo Laugher: ‘Computer model projections from at least 27 groups at universities and other research institutes in nine countries have proved solid’
Uh… name one.
Michael Oppenheimer, Kevin Trenberth and other warmists respond to Rep. Lamar Smith in the Washington Post.
7 thoughts on “Warmist WaPo Laugher: ‘Computer model projections from at least 27 groups at universities and other research institutes in nine countries have proved solid’”
So they have collectively studied climate for more than 7 decades; seems like a lot of time wasted based on what they claim to know. How much taxpayer money supported them in those 7 decades?
fourist!
With apologies, Wilbert, but when I read your comment this phrase popped into my mind: “All your base are belong to us”.
..and all base on 2+2=5
I think we know what ‘solid’ is, in this context. It’s models that agree with the projections of warming.
What, the projections of warming are from models, you say? Oh. Okay, well they’re solid because the models agree with the models.
What, that’s circular reasoning? Oh.
They’re solid alright … constipated !
Leave a Reply
Discover more from JunkScience.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Pictures are worth a thousand words
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/06/still-epic-fail-73-climate-models-vs-measurements-running-5-year-means/
So they have collectively studied climate for more than 7 decades; seems like a lot of time wasted based on what they claim to know. How much taxpayer money supported them in those 7 decades?
fourist!
With apologies, Wilbert, but when I read your comment this phrase popped into my mind: “All your base are belong to us”.
..and all base on 2+2=5
I think we know what ‘solid’ is, in this context. It’s models that agree with the projections of warming.
What, the projections of warming are from models, you say? Oh. Okay, well they’re solid because the models agree with the models.
What, that’s circular reasoning? Oh.
They’re solid alright … constipated !