4 Comments

  1. That’s strange. Don’t they welcome the chance to expose “climate change science” for the fraud it is?

  2. Gene: If Waxman is involved, it’s more of a kangaroo court than a true hearing. If the the republicans did show, he would claim that was an endorsement.

  3. I imagined something along these lines (although would have never imagined the endorsement trick without your help). But if it is really so hopeless, does it mean we would perhaps be better off living in two separate countries?

Comment

Your email address will not be published.