NYTimes v. Tesla Motors (Round 3): Broder responds to Musk

Grab the popcorn. More green on green violence.

Read Broder’s response.

About these ads

3 responses to “NYTimes v. Tesla Motors (Round 3): Broder responds to Musk

  1. Even if you stipulate that Musk is 100% right and Broder 100% wrong, it’s obviously a piece of crap car.

  2. The car may be a brilliant piece of engineering, but until “idiot proofing” enters their lexicon they won’t displace current technology. Anybody that has driven very early cars (e.g. a Model T) can appreciate that the technology was an improvement over hitching up a team of horses to a wagon and navigating across the country, but it took no small amount of mechanical knowledge, physical strength, and basic understanding of a broad range of subjects to keep the car running.

    I guarantee that if you drop the typical “driver” into anything more complicated than an “iPhone” they’ll be on the side of the road with some kind of problem by the end of the first full charge cycle.

  3. Frederick Michael

    Wrong sub-title. It should read, “More green on green violins.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s