Open Richard III DNA evidence for peer review

Too bad the New Scientist doesn’t fee this way about climate science.

“It is gratifying to see a scientific analysis given such worldwide attention. Nonetheless, scientific validity is decided not in courts, but in published work that other scientists can examine, check and criticise.”

Read more at the New Scientist.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s