“It is in part why “global warming” has been strategically rebranded as “climate change”: to overcome a conundrum that global temperatures have not followed a linear increase in a way that lobby groups find easy to explain.”
The Australian: Climate results validate sceptics
This entry was posted in Climate Change. Bookmark the permalink.
When a 150 acre bushfire (about the size of a very small Australian farm) gets wide media coverage and an average summer’s day gets termed “catastrophic” it becomes clear that maybe we shouldn’t be having any summer at all in an ideal world – which would consist I guess mainly of Akaska or Siberia (or the present South of China.)
“The Maunder Minimum: Perfect Climate for a Perfect World”
=P